Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33394213›Full record

ArticleHealth care management science2021

Stochastic programming for outpatient scheduling with flexible inpatient exam accommodation.

Yifei Sun, Usha Nandini Raghavan, Vikrant Vaze, Christopher S Hall, Patricia Doyle, Stacey Sullivan Richard, Christoph Wald

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health care management science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yifei SunThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, College, 14 Engineering Dr, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA. yifei.sun.th@dartmouth.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1270-1560
Usha Nandini RaghavanPhilips Healthcare, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Vikrant VazeThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, College, 14 Engineering Dr, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
Christopher S HallPhilips Healthcare, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Patricia DoyleLahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA.
Stacey Sullivan RichardLahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA.
Christoph WaldLahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA.
Lahey Medical Center · USDartmouth College · USPhilips (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study is concerned with the determination of an optimal appointment schedule in an outpatient-inpatient hospital system where the inpatient exams can be cancelled based on certain rules while the outpatient exams cannot be cancelled. Stochastic programming models were formulated and solved to tackle the stochasticity in the procedure durations and patient arrival patterns. The first model, a two-stage stochastic programming model, is formulated to optimize the slot size. The second model further optimizes the inpatient block (IPB) placement and slot size simultaneously. A computational method is developed to solve the second optimization problem. A case study is conducted using the data from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) centers of Lahey Hospital and Medical Center (LHMC). The current schedule and the schedules obtained from the optimization models are evaluated and compared using simulation based on FlexSim Healthcare. Results indicate that the overall weighted cost can be reduced by 11.6% by optimizing the slot size and can be further reduced by an additional 12.6% by optimizing slot size and IPB placement simultaneously. Three commonly used sequencing rules (IPBEG, OPBEG, and a variant of ALTER rule) were also evaluated. The results showed that when optimization tools are not available, ALTER variant which evenly distributes the IPBs across the day has the best performance. Sensitivity analysis of weights for patient waiting time, machine idle time and exam cancellations further supports the superiority of ALTER variant sequencing rules compared to the other sequencing methods. A Pareto frontier was also developed and presented between patient waiting time and machine idle time to enable medical centers with different priorities to obtain solutions that accurately reflect their respective optimal tradeoffs. An extended optimization model was also developed to incorporate the emergency patient arrivals. The optimal schedules from the extended model show only minor differences compared to those from the original model, thus proving the robustness of the scheduling solutions obtained from our optimal models against the impacts of emergency patient arrivals.

Indexed as

InpatientsOutpatientsAppointments and SchedulesComputer SimulationHumansTime FactorsAppointment scheduling/sequencingDiscrete-event simulationInpatient exam cancellationOperations researchOutpatient schedulingStochastic programming

Identifiers

PMID33394213
OpenAlexW3119483064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.