ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2021
Racial and geographic disparities in stage-specific incidence and mortality in the colorectal cancer hotspot region of eastern North Carolina, 2008-2016.
Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Area-level socioeconomic status is associated with colorectal cancer screening, incidence and mortality in the US: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2025Pooled it
- Assessment of Differences in Colorectal Cancer Outcomes by Geographic Region for Black Patients in the United States.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Geospatial heterogeneity of hotspots for incidence and late-stage diagnosis of breast, colorectal, and lung cancer.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- Article
- Pre-pandemic patterns in colorectal cancer mortality and Black-White inequities across the 30 most populous US cities.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2025Article
- The intersection of travel burdens and financial hardship in cancer care: a scoping review.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Article
- Understanding mechanisms of racial disparities in breast cancer: an assessment of screening and regular care in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2024Article
- The North Carolina Tissue Consortium: Ensuring Equitable Representation and Accessibility to Cancer Specimens from Eastern North Carolina.North Carolina medical journal · 2023Review
- The Persistent Three: Combating Heart Disease, Cancer, and Stroke in North Carolina.North Carolina medical journal · 2023Article
- Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Survival Differences and Potential Geographic Determinants Among Men and Women in Utah.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite improvements in colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes, geographic disparities persist. Spatial mapping identified distinct "hotspots" of increased CRC mortality, including 11 rural counties in eastern North Carolina (ENC). The primary aims of this study were to measure CRC incidence and mortality by stage and determine if racial disparities exist within ENC.
methodsData from 2008 to 2016 from the NC Central Cancer Registry were analyzed by stage, race, and region. Age-adjusted incidence and death rates (95% CI) were expressed per 100,000 persons within hotspot counties, all ENC counties, and Non-ENC counties.
resultsCRC incidence [43.7 (95% CI 39.2-48.8) vs. 38.4 (95% CI 37.6-39.2)] and mortality rates [16.1 (95% CI 16.6-19.7) vs. 13.9 (95% CI 13.7-14.2)] were higher in the hotspot than non-ENC, respectively. Overall, localized, and regional CRC incidence rates were highest among African Americans (AA) residing in the hotspot compared to Whites or Non-ENC residents. Incidence rates of distant disease were higher among AA but did not differ by region. CRC mortality rates were highest among AA in the hotspot (AA 22.0 vs. Whites 15.8) compared to Non-ENC (AA 19.3 vs. Whites 13.0), although significant stage-stratified mortality differences were not observed.
conclusionsPatients residing in the hotspot counties have higher age-adjusted incidence of overall, localized, regional, and distant CRC and mortality rates than patients in non-hotspot counties. Incidence and mortality rates remain highest among AA residing in the hotspot. IMPACT: Increased CRC incidence and mortality rates were observed among all patients in the hotspot and were highest among AA, suggestive of ongoing racial and geographic disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.