Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33394140›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2021

Direct detection of microorganisms in sonicated orthopedic devices after in vitro biofilm production and different processing conditions.

Juliette Cieslinski, Victoria Stadler Tasca Ribeiro, Letícia Kraft, Paula Hansen Suss, Edvaldo Rosa, Luis Gustavo Morello, Marcelo Pillonetto, Felipe Francisco Tuon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of sonication on staphylococcal and gram-negative biofilms relevant to prosthetic joint infections: an in vitro study.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans biofilms adherence to PEEK and titanium-alloy prosthetic spine devices.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juliette CieslinskiLaboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases (LEID), School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Victoria Stadler Tasca RibeiroLaboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases (LEID), School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Letícia KraftLaboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases (LEID), School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Paula Hansen SussLaboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases (LEID), School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Edvaldo RosaXenobiotics Research Unit, School of Life Sciences, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Luis Gustavo MorelloParaná Institute of Molecular Biology, Curitiba, Brazil.
Marcelo PillonettoSchool of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Felipe Francisco TuonLaboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases (LEID), School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. felipe.tuon@pucpr.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3471-1786
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná · BRInstituto de Biologia Molecular do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe gold standard for microbial detection in prosthetic joint infections is the multiple culture of the peri-prosthetic tissue. The fluid cultures after sonication can improve the recovery of the microorganisms.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the sonication technique with a plastic bag and the effect of refrigeration on microorganism detection with conventional culturing, MALDI-TOF MS and qPCR assay on an orthopedic screw model.

methodsWe produced biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans on orthopedic screws, which were stored under different conditions and temperatures before sonication. After sonication, the mass spectrometry by MALDI-TOF, qPCR and culture protocols was performed using the sonicated fluid, for detecting the microorganisms involved in the biofilm.

resultsThe bacterial bioburden decreased by approximately one log after the refrigeration period, in the screws containing P. aeruginosa and S. aureus biofilms. All the microorganisms involved in the screw biofilms were detected with MALDI-TOF and qPCR. Significant reductions in CFU counts occurred only in groups stored in the plastic bag, indicating that changes in temperature and humidity may favor cell death. However, this variation is not important for this model as it did not affect the detection owing to the high counts obtained.

conclusionMicrobial identification by MALDI-TOF in sonicated fluid is feasible. With qPCR, there were no differences between the detection in the screws processed immediately or after refrigeration. It is necessary to consider whether or not the refrigeration period would affect microbial recovery in an explanted prosthesis.

Indexed as

Arthritis, InfectiousProsthesis-Related InfectionsBiofilmsHumansSonicationStaphylococcus aureusBiofilmInfectionModelScrewSonication

Identifiers

PMID33394140
OpenAlexW3119985051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.