Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33394132›Full record

SynthesisActa diabetologica2021

Association between Osteoprotegerin and Charcot Neuroarthropathy: a systematic review.

Renata Ochoa-Précoma, Blanca T Pacheco-Soto, Leonardo M Porchia, Enrique Torres-Rasgado, Ricardo Pérez-Fuentes, M Elba Gonzalez-Mejia

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta diabetologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Renata Ochoa-Précoma *Facultad de Medicina, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Calle 13 Sur 2901, Colonia Volcanes, 72420, Puebla, México.
Blanca T Pacheco-Soto *Facultad de Medicina, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Calle 13 Sur 2901, Colonia Volcanes, 72420, Puebla, México.
Leonardo M PorchiaLaboratorio de Fisiopatología en Enfermedades Crónicas, Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Oriente, IMSS. Delegación Puebla. Carretera Federal Atlixco Metepec Km, 4.5, Colonia Centro, 74360, Atlixco, Puebla, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4082-7606
Enrique Torres-RasgadoFacultad de Medicina, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Calle 13 Sur 2901, Colonia Volcanes, 72420, Puebla, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5273-4522
Ricardo Pérez-FuentesLaboratorio de Fisiopatología en Enfermedades Crónicas, Centro de Investigación Biomédica de Oriente, IMSS. Delegación Puebla. Carretera Federal Atlixco Metepec Km, 4.5, Colonia Centro, 74360, Atlixco, Puebla, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9104-1427
M Elba Gonzalez-MejiaFacultad de Medicina, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Calle 13 Sur 2901, Colonia Volcanes, 72420, Puebla, México. elba.gonzalez@correo.buap.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2569-1998
Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla · MX

Funding

Programa para el Desarrollo Profesional Docente CA-160 FACMEDVicerrectorıa de Investigacion, Benemerita Universidad Autonoma de Puebla GOMM-SAL18-IVicerrectorıa de Investigacion, Benemerita Universidad Autonoma de Puebla PEFR-SAL18-GVicerrectorıa de Investigacion, Benemerita Universidad Autonoma de Puebla TORE-SAL18-G
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsOsteoprotegerin (OPG) has been associated with Charcot Neuroarthropathy (CN); however, three studied OPG polymorphisms (1181C > G, 245A > C and 950 T > C) have yielded conflicting results. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to determine the difference in serum OPG concentrations between healthy controls and diabetics with and without CN and the effect OPG polymorphisms have on CN development.

methodsPubMed, LILAC, SCOPUS, and EBSCO databases and retrieved publications' bibliographies were searched for studies that examined for OPG and CN. Depending on the heterogeneity, fixed or random effects were used to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR) or standard difference in means (SDM) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for 5 genetic models (heterozygous, homozygous, dominant, recessive, and allelic) and serum concentrations, respectively.

resultsSeven publications (12 studies) demonstrated that serum OPG concentrations were more elevated in subjects with CN (SDM = 0.719, 95%CI = 0.555-0.883, p < 0.001). When CN was compared to healthy controls or diabetics, the difference was more prominent for healthy controls (SDM = 1.043, 95%CI = 0.676-1.409, p < 0.001) than diabetics (SDM = 0.639, 95%CI = 0.456-0.821, p < 0.001) and the SDM difference was significant (p = 0.013). Using 6 publications (9 studies), neither the 1181C > G or the 950 T > C polymorphisms showed any significant associations for any genetic model. For the 245A > C polymorphism, only the homozygous genetic model showed a significant association between the polymorphism and CN (OR = 2.850, 95%CI: 1.051-7.729, p = 0.040).

conclusionsHere, we determined a potential correlation between the CN and serum OPG concentrations and that only the CC genotype of the 245A > C polymorphism showed an increased risk of developing CN.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAllelesArthropathy, NeurogenicCase-Control StudiesFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeHeterozygoteHomozygoteHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoprotegerinOsteoprotegerinTNFRSF11B protein, humanCharcot footDiabetic complicationsDiabetic footMeta-analysisNeuropathyOPGPolymorphism

Identifiers

PMID33394132
OpenAlexW3120384111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.