ReviewJournal of vision2021
Flexible contextual modulation of naturalistic texture perception in peripheral vision.
Review in Journal of vision, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- An inhibitory brainstem pathway reduces visual detection during background motion.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Are we ready to tackle perceptual segmentation of natural scenes?Vision research · 2026Review
- The CRIP effect: How a pattern in central vision interferes with perception of a pattern in the periphery.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Color crowding considered as adaptive spatial integration.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Neuronal and Behavioral Responses to Naturalistic Texture Images in Macaque Monkeys.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- The Irreducibility of Vision: Gestalt, Crowding and the Fundamentals of Vision.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Global and high-level effects in crowding cannot be predicted by either high-dimensional pooling or target cueing.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Redundancy between spectral and higher-order texture statistics for natural image segmentation.Vision research · 2021Article
- Dissecting (un)crowding.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Opposing effects of selectivity and invariance in peripheral vision.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Shrinking Bouma's window: How to model crowding in dense displays.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Texture Interpolation for Probing Visual Perception.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Peripheral vision comprises most of our visual field, and is essential in guiding visual behavior. Its characteristic capabilities and limitations, which distinguish it from foveal vision, have been explained by the most influential theory of peripheral vision as the product of representing the visual input using summary statistics. Despite its success, this account may provide a limited understanding of peripheral vision, because it neglects processes of perceptual grouping and segmentation. To test this hypothesis, we studied how contextual modulation, namely the modulation of the perception of a stimulus by its surrounds, interacts with segmentation in human peripheral vision. We used naturalistic textures, which are directly related to summary-statistics representations. We show that segmentation cues affect contextual modulation, and that this is not captured by our implementation of the summary-statistics model. We then characterize the effects of different texture statistics on contextual modulation, providing guidance for extending the model, as well as for probing neural mechanisms of peripheral vision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.