Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33393924›Full record

ArticleJMIR perioperative medicine2020

A Smartphone App With a Digital Care Pathway for Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: Development and Feasibility Study.

Madison Ponder, Abena A Ansah-Yeboah, Lefko T Charalambous, Syed M Adil, Vishal Venkatraman, Muhammad Abd-El-Barr, Michael Haglund, Peter Grossi, Chester Yarbrough, Rajeev Dharmapurikar and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR perioperative medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Patient and Staff Insights on Digital Care Pathways for Patients With Low Back Pain in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Madison Ponder *Higgs Boson Health, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4933-7216
Abena A Ansah-Yeboah *Higgs Boson Health, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8563-9492
Lefko T CharalambousDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0907-1254
Syed M AdilDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2322-5478
Vishal VenkatramanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3485-4026
Muhammad Abd-El-BarrDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7151-2861
Michael HaglundDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6332-0808
Peter GrossiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3461-3190
Chester YarbroughDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0546-6435
Rajeev DharmapurikarHiggs Boson Health, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4491-0642
Ziad GelladHiggs Boson Health, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7212-3304
Shivanand P LadDepartment of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4991-5319
Duke Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a great unmet clinical need to provide patients undergoing spinal surgery and their caregivers with ongoing, high-quality care before and after surgery in an efficiency-focused health care environment.

objectiveThe objective of this study is to design, develop, and evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of a novel planning-, outcomes-, and analytics-based smartphone app called ManageMySurgery (MMS) in patients undergoing elective spine surgery (MMS-Spine).

methodsThe development process of the MMS app was conducted over 2 sequential stages: (1) an evidence-based intervention design with refinement from surgeon and patient feedback and (2) feasibility testing in a clinical pilot study. We developed a novel, mobile-based, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant platform for interventional and surgical procedures. It is a patient-centric mobile health app that streamlines patients' interactions with their care team. MMS divides the patient journey into phases, making it feasible to provide customized care pathways that meet patients' unique needs. Patient-reported outcomes are easily collected and conform to the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) standard.

resultsWe tested the feasibility of the MMS-Spine app with patients undergoing elective spine surgery at a large academic health system. A total of 47 patients undergoing elective spine surgery (26 cervical spine and 21 lumbar spine surgeries) downloaded and used MMS-Spine to navigate their surgical journey, quantify their baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes, and provide feedback on the utility of the app in preparing for and recovering from their spinal surgery. The median age was 59.0 (range 33-77) years, 22 of the 47 patients (47%) were women, and 26 patients (55%) had commercial insurance. Of the 47 patients, a total of 33 (70%) logged in on an iOS device, 11 (23%) on an Android device, and 3 (6%) on a computer or tablet. A total of 17 of the 47 patients (36%) added a caregiver, of which 7 (41%) logged in. The median number of sign-ins was 2. A total of 38 of 47 patients (81%) completed their baseline preoperative PROMIS-29 outcomes, and 14 patients (30%) completed at least one PROMIS-29 survey during the postoperative period. Of the 24 patients who completed the MMS survey, 21 (88%) said it was helpful during preparation for their procedure, 16 (67%) said it was helpful during the postoperative period, and 23 (96%) said that they would recommend MMS to a friend or family member.

conclusionsWe used a patient-centered approach based on proven behavior change techniques to develop a comprehensive smartphone app for patients undergoing elective spine surgery. The optimized version of the app is ready for formal testing in a larger randomized clinical study to establish its cost-effectiveness and effect on patients' self-management skills and long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

behavior changedevelopmentdigital healthdigital interventionsmHealthmobile appmobile phonesmartphone appsurgerytechnology

Identifiers

PMID33393924
PMCPMC7709850
OpenAlexW3082276809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.