Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33393901›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2021

The (mis)perception of sleep: factors influencing the discrepancy between self-reported and objective sleep parameters.

Karin Trimmel, Hans Gerhard Eder, Marion Böck, Andrijana Stefanic-Kejik, Gerhard Klösch, Stefan Seidel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sleep trajectories across three cognitive-aging pathways in community older adults.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Conceptualizing Sleep Satisfaction: A Rapid Review.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Karin TrimmelDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hans Gerhard EderDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Marion BöckDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Andrijana Stefanic-KejikDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gerhard KlöschDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan SeidelDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATIn-Q-Tel · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesSelf-reported perception of sleep often differs from objective sleep study measures, but factors predicting the discrepancy between self-reported and objective sleep parameters are controversial, and a comparison of laboratory vs ambulatory polysomnography (PSG) is lacking.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed PSGs conducted between 2012 and 2016. Linear regression was applied to predict the discrepancy between self-reported and objective sleep parameters (total sleep time, sleep efficiency, sleep latency, using age, sex, arousal index, type of sleep disorder, and PSG type [laboratory vs ambulatory] as regressors).

resultsA total of 303 PSGs were analyzed (49% women, median age 48 years), comprising patients with insomnia (32%), sleep-related breathing disorders (27%), sleep-related movement disorders (15%), hypersomnia/narcolepsy (14%), and parasomnias (12%). Sleep disorder was the best predictor of discrepancy between self-reported and objective total sleep time, and patients with insomnia showed higher discrepancy values compared to all other patient groups (P < .001), independent of age and PSG type (P > .05). Contributory effects for higher discrepancy values were found for lower arousal index. Patients with insomnia underestimated both total sleep time (median discrepancy: 46 minutes, P < .001) and sleep efficiency (median discrepancy: 11%, P < .001). No significant predictor for discrepancy of sleep latency was found.

conclusionsMisperception of sleep duration and efficiency is common in sleep lab patients, but most prominent in insomnia, independent of age, sex, or laboratory vs ambulatory recording setting. This underlines the role of PSG in patients with a clinical diagnosis of insomnia and its use in cognitive behavioral therapy.

Indexed as

SleepSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionRetrospective StudiesSelf ReportambulatoryarousalinsomniamisperceptionobjectivePSGself-reportedsex

Identifiers

PMID33393901
PMCPMC8320481
OpenAlexW3120584361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.