ArticleJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology2021
Computing the Rearrangement Distance of Natural Genomes.
Article in Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- The shared evolutionary capacities of plasmids and extrachromosomal DNA.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Novel Strategy for Structural Variant Genotyping by Short-Read Genomic Sequencing From Restriction-Circles: Experimental and Bioinformatics Proof-of-Concept.Human mutation · 2026Article
- Insights into Yersinia pestis evolution through rearrangement analysis of 242 complete genomes.Nature genetics · 2025Article
- Reconstructing rearrangement phylogenies of natural genomes.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2025Article
- An Exact and Fast SAT Formulation for the DCJ Distance.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Applying rearrangement distances to enable plasmid epidemiology with pling.Microbial genomics · 2024Article
- RIBAP: a comprehensive bacterial core genome annotation pipeline for pangenome calculation beyond the species level.Genome biology · 2024Article
- The Floor Is Lava: Halving Natural Genomes with Viaducts, Piers, and Pontoons.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2024Article
- Recombinations, chains and caps: resolving problems with the DCJ-indel model.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2024Article
- AGO, a Framework for the Reconstruction of Ancestral Syntenies and Gene Orders.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Chromosomal gene order defines several structural classes of Staphylococcus epidermidis genomes.PloS one · 2024Article
- SDRAP for annotating scrambled or rearranged genomes.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Constructing founder sets under allelic and non-allelic homologous recombination.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2023Article
- Efficient gene orthology inference via large-scale rearrangements.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2023Article
- Generalizations of the genomic rank distance to indels.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Natural family-free genomic distance.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The computation of genomic distances has been a very active field of computational comparative genomics over the past 25 years. Substantial results include the polynomial-time computability of the inversion distance by Hannenhalli and Pevzner in 1995 and the introduction of the double cut and join distance by Yancopoulos et al. in 2005. Both results, however, rely on the assumption that the genomes under comparison contain the same set of unique markers (syntenic genomic regions, sometimes also referred to as genes). In 2015, Shao et al. relax this condition by allowing for duplicate markers in the analysis. This generalized version of the genomic distance problem is NP-hard, and they give an integer linear programming (ILP) solution that is efficient enough to be applied to real-world datasets. A restriction of their approach is that it can be applied only to balanced genomes that have equal numbers of duplicates of any marker. Therefore, it still needs a delicate preprocessing of the input data in which excessive copies of unbalanced markers have to be removed. In this article, we present an algorithm solving the genomic distance problem for natural genomes, in which any marker may occur an arbitrary number of times. Our method is based on a new graph data structure, the multi-relational diagram, that allows an elegant extension of the ILP by Shao et al. to count runs of markers that are under- or over-represented in one genome with respect to the other and need to be inserted or deleted, respectively. With this extension, previous restrictions on the genome configurations are lifted, for the first time enabling an uncompromising rearrangement analysis. Any marker sequence can directly be used for the distance calculation. The evaluation of our approach shows that it can be used to analyze genomes with up to a few 10,000 markers, which we demonstrate on simulated and real data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.