Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33393827›Full record

ReviewPsychology & health2021

Informal caregiver burden for solid tumour cancer patients: a review and future directions.

Kanjana Thana, Rebecca Lehto, Alla Sikorskii, Gwen Wyatt

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychology & health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
21.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Systematic review of caregiver burden, unmet needs and quality-of-life among informal caregivers of patients with pancreatic cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Exploring the determinants of health literacy and its effects on health-related outcomes in family caregivers of patients with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Current status and influence of positive aspects of caregiving among family caregivers of patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  13. The weight of time: experience of time toxicity among advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers-a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. "The biggest challenge is there's never a routine": a qualitative study of the time burdens of cancer care at home.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kanjana ThanaFaculty of Nursing, Chiangmai University, Chiangmai, Thailand.
Rebecca LehtoCollege of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Alla SikorskiiDepartment of Psychiatry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Gwen WyattCollege of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Michigan State University · USChiang Mai University · TH

Funding

Using SMART Design to Improve Symptom Management Strategies Among Cancer PatientsR01CA193706 · NCI · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SIKORSKII, ALLA, WYATT, GWEN KARILYN · 2016 to 2019
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA193706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRecent shifts in healthcare delivery and treatment for solid tumour cancer patients have modified the responsibilities of informal caregivers. The objective of this study was to: review informal caregiver burden factors and determine areas where future research is needed.

methodsThe Arksey and O'Malley's framework and a modified Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses were used in conducting this review. Research literature was systematically searched using five-electronic databases, including PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane, CINAHL, and SCOPUS, and reference lists from included studies to identify publications since 2010. Inclusion criterion was caregivers providing home-based care to a cancer patient.

resultsThe search yielded 43 eligible papers of 2119 reviewed, including articles from over 17 countries. Caregiver physical and psychological health, financial strain, and social isolation, as well as limited family and social support continued to be important factors contributing to high levels of caregiver burden. Less recognised factors affecting higher burden included caregivers' self-esteem, male gender, and the dynamic nature of cancer treatment.

conclusionsThis review updates the state of the science on informal caregiver burden when caring for patients with solid tumour cancers and informs future interventions on how to reduce this burden.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesNeoplasmsCaregiver BurdenCaregiversHumansMaleSocial SupportburdenCancercaregivingreview

Identifiers

PMID33393827
PMCPMC8254816
OpenAlexW3120069984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.