Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33393449›Full record

ArticleErgonomics2021

Effects of firefighting hood design, laundering and doffing on smoke protection, heat stress and wearability.

Richard M Kesler, Alex Mayer, Kenneth W Fent, I-Chen Chen, A Shawn Deaton, R Bryan Ormond, Denise L Smith, Andrea Wilkinson, Steve Kerber, Gavin P Horn

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ergonomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard M KeslerIllinois Fire Service Institute, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Alex MayerDivision of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2141-9033
Kenneth W FentDivision of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
I-Chen ChenDivision of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6764-8395
A Shawn DeatonTextile Protection and Comfort Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
R Bryan OrmondTextile Protection and Comfort Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9799-546X
Denise L SmithIllinois Fire Service Institute, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Andrea WilkinsonDivision of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Steve KerberUnderwriters Laboratories Inc., Firefighter Safety Research Institute, Columbia, MD, USA.
Gavin P HornIllinois Fire Service Institute, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USA. N. Kosygin Moscow State Textile University · RUUL Research Institutes · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Firefighter hoods must provide protection from elevated temperatures and products of combustion (e.g. particulate) while simultaneously being wearable (comfortable and not interfering with firefighting activities). The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of (1) hood design (traditional knit hood vs particulate-blocking hood), (2) repeated laundering, and (3) hood removal method (traditional vs overhead doffing) on (a) protection from soot contamination on the neck, (b) heat stress and (c) wearability measures. Using a fireground exposure simulator, 24 firefighters performed firefighting activities in realistic smoke and heat conditions using a new knit hood, new particulate-blocking hood and laundered particulate-blocking hood. Overall, soot contamination levels measured from neck skin were lower when wearing the laundered particulate-blocking hoods compared to new knit hoods, and when using the overhead hood removal process. No significant differences in skin temperature, core temperature, heart rate or wearability measures were found between the hood conditions.

Indexed as

FirefightersLaunderingOccupational ExposureHeat-Shock ResponseHumansPersonal Protective EquipmentSmokeSmokechemical exposuresfirefightingheat stressPersonal protective equipmentwearability

Identifiers

PMID33393449
PMCPMC9066276
OpenAlexW3119021710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.