ArticleThe oncologist2021
Novel Tumor Growth Rate Analysis in the Randomized CLARINET Study Establishes the Efficacy of Lanreotide Depot/Autogel 120 mg with Prolonged Administration in Indolent Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Article in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment of advanced BP-NETS with lanreotide autogel/depot vs placebo: the phase III SPINET study.Endocrine-related cancer · 2024Trial
- Pembrolizumab alone and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in previously treated, extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas.British journal of cancer · 2023Trial
- A First-in-Human Phase I Study of Milademetan, an MDM2 Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Liposarcoma, Solid Tumors, or Lymphomas.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Trial
- Tumor Dynamic Model-Based Decision Support for Phase Ib/II Combination Studies: A Retrospective Assessment Based on Resampling of the Phase III Study IMpower150.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023Trial
- Cancer interception during treatment: using growth kinetics to create a continuous variable for assessing disease response.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Tumor Growth Rate in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: An Additional Tool for Treatment Strategies?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Correlation between tumor growth rate and survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Improving neuroendocrine tumor treatments with mathematical modeling: lessons from other endocrine cancers.Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England) · 2025Review
- Review
- Tumor Growth Rate After Nadir Is Associated With Survival in Patients WithJCO precision oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionTumor quantity while receiving cancer therapy is the sum of simultaneous regression of treatment-sensitive and growth of treatment-resistant fractions at constant rates. Exponential rate constants for tumor regression/decay (d) and growth (g) can be estimated. Previous studies established g as a biomarker for overall survival; g increases after treatment cessation, can estimate doubling times, and can assess treatment effectiveness in small cohorts by benchmarking to large reference data sets. Using this approach, we analyzed data from the clinical trial CLARINET, evaluating lanreotide depot/autogel 120 mg/4 weeks (LAN) for treatment of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Computed tomography imaging data from 97 LAN- and 101 placebo-treated patients from CLARINET were analyzed to estimate g and d.
resultsData from 92% of LAN- and 94% of placebo-treated patients could be fit to one of the equations to derive g and d (p < .001 in most data sets). LAN-treated patients demonstrated significantly slower g than placebo recipients (p = .00315), a difference of 389 days in doubling times. No significant difference was observed in d. Over periods of LAN administration up to 700 days, g did not change appreciably. Simulated analysis with g as the endpoint showed a sample size of 48 sufficient to detect a difference in median g with 80% power.
conclusionAlthough treatment of NETs with LAN can affect tumor shrinkage, LAN primarily slows tumor growth rather than accelerates tumor regression. Evidence of LAN efficacy across tumors was identified. The growth-retarding effect achieved with LAN was sustained for a prolonged period of time. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The only curative treatment for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is surgical resection; however, because of frequent late diagnosis, this is often impossible. Because of this, treatment of NETs is challenging and often aims to reduce tumor burden and delay progression. A novel method of analysis was used to examine data from the CLARINET trial, confirming lanreotide depot/autogel is effective at slowing tumor growth and extending progression-free survival. By providing the expected rate and doubling time of tumor growth early in the course of treatment, this method of analysis has the potential to guide physicians in their management of patients with NETs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.