Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33392951›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2021

SAMPL7 Host-Guest Challenge Overview: assessing the reliability of polarizable and non-polarizable methods for binding free energy calculations.

Martin Amezcua, Léa El Khoury, David L Mobley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Partially Sulfated Pillar[5]Arenes: Synthesis and Molecular Recognition Properties.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Tuning Potential Functions to Host-Guest Binding Data.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Free energies at QM accuracy from force fields via multimap targeted estimation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martin AmezcuaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4926-6542
Léa El KhouryDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3157-9425
David L MobleyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA. dmobley@mobleylab.org.ORCID 0000-0002-1083-5533

Funding

Advancing predictive physical modeling through focused development of model systems to drive new modeling innovationsR01GM124270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI MOBLEY, DAVID LOWELL · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SAMPL challenges focus on testing and driving progress of computational methods to help guide pharmaceutical drug discovery. However, assessment of methods for predicting binding affinities is often hampered by computational challenges such as conformational sampling, protonation state uncertainties, variation in test sets selected, and even lack of high quality experimental data. SAMPL blind challenges have thus frequently included a component focusing on host-guest binding, which removes some of these challenges while still focusing on molecular recognition. Here, we report on the results of the SAMPL7 blind prediction challenge for host-guest affinity prediction. In this study, we focused on three different host-guest categories-a familiar deep cavity cavitand series which has been featured in several prior challenges (where we examine binding of a series of guests to two hosts), a new series of cyclodextrin derivatives which are monofunctionalized around the rim to add amino acid-like functionality (where we examine binding of two guests to a series of hosts), and binding of a series of guests to a new acyclic TrimerTrip host which is related to previous cucurbituril hosts. Many predictions used methods based on molecular simulations, and overall success was mixed, though several methods stood out. As in SAMPL6, we find that one strategy for achieving reasonable accuracy here was to make empirical corrections to binding predictions based on previous data for host categories which have been studied well before, though this can be of limited value when new systems are included. Additionally, we found that alchemical free energy methods using the AMOEBA polarizable force field had considerable success for the two host categories in which they participated. The new TrimerTrip system was also found to introduce some sampling problems, because multiple conformations may be relevant to binding and interconvert only slowly. Overall, results in this challenge tentatively suggest that further investigation of polarizable force fields for these challenges may be warranted.

Indexed as

Computer-Aided DesignCucurbit(n)urilsEntropyHumansLigandsMacrocyclic CompoundsMolecular Dynamics SimulationMolecular StructureProtein BindingProteinsThermodynamicsCucurbit(n)urilsLigandsMacrocyclic CompoundsProteinsBinding affinityBlind challengeCucurbiturilCyclodextrinFree energyHost–guest bindingOctaAcidSAMPL

Identifiers

PMID33392951
PMCPMC8121194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.