ArticleInternational ophthalmology2021
Vision outcomes with a new monofocal IOL.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Visual and patient-reported outcomes of an enhanced versus monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eye (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation of an enhanced monofocal intraocular lens: a single-masked prospective randomized study.International ophthalmology · 2024Trial
- Clinical outcomes with an aspheric monofocal and a new enhanced monofocal intraocular lens with modified optical profile.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023Trial
- Clinical outcomes of bilateral implantation of new generation monofocal IOL enhanced for intermediate distance and conventional monofocal IOL in a Korean population.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Trial
- Adaptive-Optics-Based Simulation of Astigmatism Effects on Visual Acuity with Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Observational
- Expanding visual horizons: comparative outcomes of bilateral implantation of an extended depth-of-focus versus enhanced and standard monofocal intraocular lenses.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Visual and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of Two Enhanced Monofocal IOLs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Association of preoperative corneal spherical aberration with intermediate-to-near visual acuity in enhanced monofocal intraocular lens implantation: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Visual outcomes of aberration neutral versus monofocal plus IOLs in triple DMEK surgery.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of the enhanced monofocal intraocular lens in glaucoma of varying severity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Intermediate Vision Following Monofocal IOL Implantation.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Comparison of visual acuity and optical quality between higher-order aspheric monofocal and standard introcular lenses.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Comparision of a Novel Trifocal Intraocular Lens and a Monofocal Enhanced Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens in Visual Performance and Quality of Life Scores.Beyoglu eye journal · 2025Article
- Comparison of bilateral implantation of monofocal intraocular lenses with enhanced intermediate function targeting with - 2.00 D and emmetropia in moderate to high myopic Asian patients.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2024Article
- Screening for multifocal intraocular lens implantation in cataract patients in a public hospital.International ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a New Enhanced Monofocal IOL and a Conventional Monofocal IOL.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Improved Intermediate Visual Function with New Monofocal Intraocular Lens in Combined Cataract and Vitrectomy Surgery for Retinal Disease.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2023Observational
- Comparison of the Visual Outcomes of Enhanced and Standard Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantations in Eyes with Early Glaucoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Comparative Analysis of Optical Quality of Monofocal, Enhanced Monofocal, Multifocal, and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Mobile Model Eye Study.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
- Real world outcomes of the new Tecnis Eyhance IOL.European journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to compare the distance, intermediate, and near visual performance of a new IOL (ICB00, Eyhance, Tecnis) and classic monofocal IOL (SN60WF IQ AcrySof, Alcon) after unilateral implantation.
methodsSixty-three patients were unilaterally implanted with the ICB00 Eyhance IOL (study group) and 65 patients with the SN60WF IQ AcrySof (control group). Visual performance was assessed with monocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) at 4 m, corrected intermediate visual acuity (CIVA) and uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) at 60 cm, and corrected near visual acuity (CNVA) and uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) at 40 cm.
resultsCDVA, UDVA, CNVA, and UNVA values did not differ significantly between the study and control groups (0.02 ± 0.02 vs. 0.03 ± 0.02, p = 0.523; 0.05 ± 0.13 vs. 0.05 ± 0.15, p = 0.637; 0.46 ± 0.17 vs. 0.46 ± 0.15, p = 0.821; and 0.47 ± 0.21 vs. 0.49 ± 0.25, p = 0.612; respectively), whereas the study group showed significantly better results for CIVA (0.28 ± 0.12 vs. 0.38 ± 0.13, p = 0.001) and UIVA (0.31 ± 0.16 vs. 0.41 ± 0.12, p = 0.001).
conclusionsThe Eyhance IOL, which features a new optical design based on a continuous power profile, was determined to be superior to a classic monofocal IOL for intermediate visual acuity and not inferior for corrected and uncorrected distance and near visual acuity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33392939What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.