Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33392914›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2021

Female birds monitor the activity of their mates while brooding nest-bound young.

Jonathan B Jenkins, Alexander J Mueller, Charles F Thompson, Scott K Sakaluk, E Keith Bowers

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan B JenkinsDepartment of Biological Sciences, Center for Biodiversity Research, Edward J. Meeman Biological Station, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, 38152, USA.
Alexander J MuellerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Center for Biodiversity Research, Edward J. Meeman Biological Station, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, 38152, USA.
Charles F ThompsonBehavior, Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics Section, School of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, IL, 61790-4120, USA.
Scott K SakalukBehavior, Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics Section, School of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, IL, 61790-4120, USA.
E Keith BowersDepartment of Biological Sciences, Center for Biodiversity Research, Edward J. Meeman Biological Station, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, 38152, USA. ekbowers@memphis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4488-1463
Illinois State University · USNational Park Service · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USUniversity of Memphis · US

Funding

Induced immunity as a source of maternal effects on offspring phenotypeR15HD076308 · NICHD · ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SAKALUK, SCOTT K, THOMPSON, CHARLES · 2013 to 2017
$846k
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R15HD076308NICHD NIH HHS R15 HD076308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to food and protection, altricial young in many species are ectothermic and require that endothermic parents provide warmth to foster growth, yet only one parent-typically the female-broods these young to keep them warm. When this occurs, reduced provisioning by males obliges females to forage instead of providing warmth for offspring, favoring the temporal mapping of male activities. We assessed this in a wild house wren population while experimentally feeding nestlings to control offspring satiety. While brooding, females look out from the nest to inspect their surroundings, and we hypothesized that this helps to determine if their mate is nearby and likely to deliver food to the brood (males pass food to brooding females, which pass the food to nestlings). Females looked out from the nest less often when their partner was singing nearby and when his singing and provisioning were temporally linked, signaling his impending food delivery. Females also left to forage less often when their mate was nearby and likely to deliver food. Nestling begging did not affect these behaviors. Females looking out from the nest more often also provisioned at a higher rate and were more likely to divorce and find a new mate prior to nesting again within seasons, as expected if females switch mates when a male fails to meet expectations. Our results suggest anticipatory effects generated by male behavior and that brooding females temporally map male activity to inform decisions about whether to continue brooding or to leave the nest to forage.

Indexed as

Nesting BehaviorSongbirdsAnimalsFemaleMaleReproductionSeasonsVocalization, AnimalClassical conditioningCost of reproductionParental careParent–offspring conflictSexual conflictTemporal mapping

Identifiers

PMID33392914
PMCPMC8131226
OpenAlexW3119251394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.