ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2021
Diagnostic discrepancies between antemortem clinical diagnosis and autopsy findings in pediatric cancer patients.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Examining the association between socioeconomic status, clinical assessment, and dental caries experience in oncology patients: a 5-year review of a tertiary-care hospital.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026Article
- Major discrepancy between clinical diagnosis of death and anatomopathological findings in adolescents with chronic diseases during 18-years.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2023Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Pathological Examination in Forensic Medicine: Past, Present, and Future.Cureus · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prevalence of discrepancies between antemortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem autopsy findings is uncertain in pediatric oncology given improving diagnostic capabilities over time. Primary objective was to describe discrepancies between antemortem and postmortem diagnosis of pediatric cancer deaths. Secondary objective was to compare clinical characteristics of deaths with and without major diagnostic discrepancies. This was a retrospective study that included pediatric cancer patients diagnosed and treated in Ontario and who died from 2003 to 2012. Antemortem clinical diagnoses associated with mortality were determined by reviewing the patient's health records 2 weeks prior to death while the postmortem diagnoses were determined by the autopsy report. Discrepancies among these diagnoses were classified using the Goldman criteria where major discrepancies were directly related to the cause of death in contrast to minor discrepancies. Among the 821 patients who died, 118 (14%) had an autopsy and were included. Of these autopsies, 12 (10%) had a major diagnostic discrepancy between antemortem and postmortem diagnoses. Major discrepancies consisted of opportunistic infections (n = 5), missed cancer diagnosis (n = 3), and organ complications (n = 4). Death in a high acuity setting (12/12, 100% vs. 60/106, 57%; P = 0.003) and treatment-related mortality (12/12, 100% vs. 60/106, 57%; P = 0.003) were significantly associated with major discrepancy. Major diagnostic discrepancy was found in 10% of pediatric oncology autopsies. Missed infections and organ complications were predominant etiologies. Death in a high acuity setting and treatment-related mortality were associated with major diagnostic discrepancies. Autopsies continue to be important for improving diagnostic insight and may improve future clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.