ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021
Clinical impact of walking capacity on the risk of disability and hospitalizations among elderly patients with advanced lung cancer.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pretreatment quality of life and survival in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Factors associated with ADL-defined disability-free survival among patients with advanced cancer in a palliative care setting: a retrospective cohort study.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- The association between physical activity levels and quality of life in elderly lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in China: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- The value of walking: a systematic review on mobility and healthcare costs.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLittle is known about the impact of decreased walking capacity on clinical outcomes in elderly patients with cancer. This prospective observational study aimed to investigate the impact of walking capacity on the risk of disability and hospitalization in elderly patients with advanced lung cancer.
methodThis study prospectively enrolled 60 patients aged ≥ 70 years with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) scheduled to receive first-line chemotherapy or radical radiotherapy between January 2013 and December 2014 (trial registration number: UMIN000009768). Patients were classified into the mobile or less mobile group based on the median incremental shuttle walking distance (ISWD) before initial treatment. Assessments included the Barthel index, disability-free survival time, mean cumulative lengths of hospital stay, and inpatient medical costs.
resultsThe median ISWD was 290 m (interquartile range, 245-357.5 m). The mobile group (ISWD ≥ 290 m) had a longer disability-free survival time than the less mobile group (ISWD < 290 m, 24.6 months vs. 8.4 months, p < 0.05). During the first year from study entry, the mobile group had shorter cumulative lengths of hospital stay (41.3 vs. 72.9 days/person, p < 0.05) and lower inpatient medical costs (¥1.9 vs. ¥2.9 million/person, p < 0.05) than the less mobile group.
conclusionElderly NSCLC patients with adequate walking capacity showed lower risks of disability, shorter hospitalizations, and lower inpatient medical costs than patients with reduced walking capacity. Further prospective research is needed to validate these findings. The trial was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network as trial number UMIN000009768 on January 13, 2013.
trial registrationUMIN000009768.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.