Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33392737›Full record

SynthesisNeuroradiology2021

Systematic review of radiological cervical foraminal grading systems.

James Meacock, Moritz Schramm, Senthil Selvanathan, Stuart Currie, Deborah Stocken, David Jayne, Simon Thomson

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

James MeacockDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK. james.meacock@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2775-1838
Moritz SchrammDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK.
Senthil SelvanathanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK.
Stuart CurrieDepartment of Neuroradiology, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK.
Deborah StockenLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
David JayneDepartment of Academic Surgery, St James University Hospital, Level 7 Clinical Sciences Bldg, Leeds, LS9 7TF, England.
Simon ThomsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK.
Leeds General Infirmary · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Royal College of Surgeons of England Research Academic Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study design of this paper is systematic review. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the existing radiological grading systems that are used to assess cervical foraminal stenosis. The importance of imaging the cervical spine using CT or MRI in evaluating cervical foraminal stenosis is widely accepted; however, there is no consensus for standardized methodology to assess the compression of the cervical nerve roots. A systematic search of Ovid Medline databases, Embase 1947 to present, Cinahl, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ISRCTN and WHO international clinical trials was performed for reports of cervical foraminal stenosis published before 01 February 2020. In collaboration with the University of Leeds, a search strategy was developed. A total of 6952 articles were identified with 59 included. Most of the reports involved multiple imaging modalities with standard axial and sagittal imaging used most. The grading themes that came from this systematic review show that the most mature for cervical foraminal stenosis is described by (Kim et al. Korean J Radiol 16:1294, 2015) and (Park et al. Br J Radiol 86:20120515, 2013). Imaging of the cervical nerve root canals is mostly performed using MRI and is reported using subjective terminology. The Park, Kim and Modified Kim systems for classifying the degree of stenosis of the nerve root canal have been described. Clinical application of these scoring systems is limited by their reliance on nonstandard imaging (Park), limited validation against clinical symptoms and surgical outcome data. Oblique fine cut images derived from three dimensional MRI datasets may yield more consistency, better clinical correlation, enhanced surgical decision-making and outcomes.

Indexed as

RadiculopathySpinal StenosisCervical VertebraeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadiographySpinal Nerve RootsGradingNeurosurgeryRadiculopathyRadiologySystematic review and spine

Identifiers

PMID33392737
OpenAlexW3119056329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.