Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33392735›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2021

Long-term clinical and angiographic follow-up results of the dual-layer flow diverter device (FRED) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in a multicenter study.

Hasan Dinc, Isil Saatci, Sukru Oguz, Feyyaz Baltacioglu, Altan Yildiz, Halil Donmez, Umit Belet, Baran Onal, Cagatay Andic, Osman Koc and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Long-term results and comparison of flow re-direction endoluminal device and pipeline embolization device in endovascular treatment of intracranial carotid aneurysms.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Hasan DincRadiology Department, School of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0738-1809
Isil SaatciInterventional Neuroradiology Section, Koru Hospitals, Kizilirmak mah, 1450 sokak 9/19 Cukurambar, 06510, Ankara, Turkey. isaatci@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1690-5501
Sukru OguzRadiology Department, School of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1354-8898
Feyyaz BaltaciogluRadiology Department, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9090-6716
Altan YildizRadiology Department, School of Medicine, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2379-3878
Halil DonmezRadiology Department, School of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7145-4769
Umit BeletRadiology Department, University of Health Sciences, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4550-5435
Baran OnalRadiology Department, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2830-3068
Cagatay AndicRadiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Baskent University, Adana, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8581-8685
Osman KocRadiology Department, Meram Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2123-4589
Omer KocakRadiology Department, Koru Hospitals, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0143-2206
Mert KorogluInterventional Radiology Clinic, Medical Park VM Hospital, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1937-5761
Mustafa CetinRadiology Department, University of Health Sciences Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3506-2039
H Saruhan CekirgeInterventional Neuroradiology Section, Koru Hospitals, Kizilirmak mah, 1450 sokak 9/19 Cukurambar, 06510, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4521-2301
Karadeniz Technical University · TRAnkara Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRAntalya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRBaşkent University · TRErciyes University · TRGazi University · TRIzmir University · TRMarmara University · TRMemorial Ankara Hospital · TRMersin Üniversitesi · TRNecmettin Erbakan University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur aim was to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of the Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) in this multicenter study with prospective design. MATERIALS-

methodThis study included 136 consecutive patients with 155 aneurysms treated between March 2013 and June 2016 in 10 centers. Twenty-two (16.2%) patients presented with rupture of the index aneurysm. Large/giant aneurysms comprised 1/3 of the cohort. Adjuvant coil use during the treatment was 15.5%. The effectiveness measure in the study was the percentage of aneurysms with stable occlusion at follow-up.

resultsVascular imaging follow-up was performed at least once in 131/136 (96.3%) patients with 148/155 (95.5%) aneurysms up to 75 months (mean: 37.3 months; median: 36 months according to latest follow-up), and 102/155(65.8%) aneurysms in 90/136 (66.2%) patients had ≥ 24-month control. According to the latest controls, the overall stable occlusion rate was 91.9% (95% CI, 87.5 to 96.3%). Three out of 148 aneurysms with follow-up were retreated (2%, 95% CI 0.0 to 4.3%). Adverse events were noted in 19/136 (14%, 95% CI, 9 to 21%) patients with a morbidity of 1.5% (95% CI, 0.0 to 3.5%). Mortality was 1/136 (0.7%, 95% CI, 0.02 to 2.2%) and was unrelated to aneurysm treatment. In-stent stenosis (ISS) was detected in 10/131 of the patients with follow-up (7.6%, 95% CI; 3.1 to 12.2%), only one being symptomatic. No adverse events have occurred in any of the patients with follow-up after 24 months, except the one resulting from ISS.

conclusionIn the treatment of cerebral aneurysms which were candidates for flow diversion technique, this study showed long-term efficacy of FRED with good safety and occlusion rates.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmCerebral AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesStentsTreatment OutcomeCerebral aneurysmEndovascular treatmentFlow diversionFlow Re-Direction Endoluminal device = FRED

Identifiers

PMID33392735
OpenAlexW3120748976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.