Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33392695›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2021

Does exposure to startle impact voluntary reaching movements in individuals with severe-to-moderate stroke?

Marziye Rahimi, Zoe Swann, Claire F Honeycutt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. What Is the StartReact Effect?Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marziye RahimiIra A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, Arizona State University, 699 S Mill Ave, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA. mrahimit@asu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6631-8893
Zoe SwannSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, 427 E Tyler Mall, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
Claire F HoneycuttSchool of Biological and Health Science Engineering, Arizona State University, 501 E Tyler Mall, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
Arizona State University · US

Funding

Mechanisms underlying impaired postural corrections following strokeR00HD073240 · NICHD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI HONEYCUTT, CLAIRE F. · 2015 to 2017
$683k
NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD073240NIH HHS R00 HD073240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When movements of individuals with stroke (iwS) are elicited by startling acoustic stimulus (SAS), reaching movements are faster, further, and directed away from the body. However, these startle-evoked movements also elicit task-inappropriate flexor activity, raising concerns that chronic exposure to startle might also induce heightened flexor activity during voluntarily elicited movement. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of startle exposure on voluntary movements during point-to-point reaching in individuals with moderate and severe stroke. We hypothesize that startle exposure will increase task-inappropriate activity in flexor muscles, which will be associated with worse voluntarily initiated reaching performance (e.g. decreased distance, displacement, and final accuracy). Eleven individuals with moderate-to-severe stroke (UEFM = 8-41/66 and MAS = 0-4/4) performed voluntary point-to-point reaching with 1/3 of trials elicited by an SAS. We used electromyography to measure activity in brachioradialis (BR), biceps (BIC), triceps lateral head (TRI), pectoralis (PEC), anterior deltoid (AD), and posterior deltoid (PD). Conversely to our hypothesis, exposure to startle did not increase abnormal flexion but rather antagonist activity in the elbow flexors and shoulder horizontal adductors decreased, suggesting that abnormal flexor/extensor co-contraction was reduced. This reduction of flexion led to increased reaching distance (18.2% farther), movement onset (8.6% faster), and final accuracy (16.1% more accurate) by the end of the session. This study offers the first evidence that exposure to startle in iwS does not negatively impact voluntary movement; moreover, exposure may improve volitionally activated reaching movements by decreasing abnormal flexion activity.

Indexed as

ArmStrokeAdultAgedElbowElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMovementMuscle, SkeletalReflex, StartleYoung AdultAbnormal flexor activityPoint-to-point reachingRehabilitationSevere strokeStartle

Identifiers

PMID33392695
PMCPMC7943527
OpenAlexW3120281041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.