Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33392607›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2020

Definitions of Computer-Assisted Surgery and Intervention, Image-Guided Surgery and Intervention, Hybrid Operating Room, and Guidance Systems: Strasbourg International Consensus Study.

Mariano Giménez, Benôit Gallix, Guido Costamagna, Jean-Nicolas Vauthey, Michael Moche, Go Wakabayashi, Reto Bale, Lee Swanström, Jürgen Futterer, David Geller and 26 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Endo-anesthesia: a primer.Gastroenterology report · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Mariano GiménezResearch Institute against Cancer of the Digestive System (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France.
Benôit GallixInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire IHU, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Guido CostamagnaDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, and Centre for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training (CERTT), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Jean-Nicolas VautheyDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Michael MocheDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Helios Park-Klinikum, Leipzig, Germany.
Go WakabayashiDepartment of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Reto BaleInterventional Oncology-Microinvasive Therapy (SIP), University Clinic for Radiology, Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
Lee SwanströmInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire IHU, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Jürgen FuttererRadboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
David GellerDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Juan M VerdeResearch Institute against Cancer of the Digestive System (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France.
Alain García VazquezResearch Institute against Cancer of the Digestive System (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France.
Ivo BoškoskiDigestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, and Centre for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training (CERTT), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Nicolas GolseCentre Hépato-Biliaire, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France.
Beat Müller-StichMinimally Invasive Surgery, Surgical Clinic University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Bernard DallemagneResearch Institute against Cancer of the Digestive System (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France.
Mårten FalkenbergDepartment of Radiology at the Department of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sven JonasDepartment of Visceral Surgery, 310Klinik, Nuremberg, Germany.
Carina RiedigerDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Michele DianaResearch Institute against Cancer of the Digestive System (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France.
Niklas KvarnströmDepartment of Surgery at Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Bruno C OdisioDepartment of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Edgardo SerraDAICIM Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Christiaan OverduinRadboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Mariano PalermoDAICIM Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Didier MutterResearch Institute against Cancer of the Digestive System (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France.
Silvana PerrettaResearch Institute against Cancer of the Digestive System (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France.
Patrick PessauxResearch Institute against Cancer of the Digestive System (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France.
Luc SolerVisible Patient, Strasbourg, France.
Alexandre HostettlerResearch Institute against Cancer of the Digestive System (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France.
Toby CollinsInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire IHU, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Stéphane CotinINRIA, Strasbourg. France.
Michael KostrzewaInstitut Hospitalo-Universitaire IHU, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Amilcar AlzagaAdvanced Therapies Surgery, Siemens, Forchheim, Germany.
Martin Smith‡‡‡Department of Surgery, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Jacques MarescauxResearch Institute against Cancer of the Digestive System (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France.

Funding

Anatomical Modeling to Improve the Precision of Image Guided Liver AblationR01CA235564 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BROCK, KRISTY, ODISIO, BRUNO C · 2019 to 2023
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA235564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop consensus definitions of image-guided surgery, computer-assisted surgery, hybrid operating room, and surgical navigation systems. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The use of minimally invasive procedures has increased tremendously over the past 2 decades, but terminology related to image-guided minimally invasive procedures has not been standardized, which is a barrier to clear communication.

methodsExperts in image-guided techniques and specialized engineers were invited to engage in a systematic process to develop consensus definitions of the key terms listed above. The process was designed following review of common consensus-development methodologies and included participation in 4 online surveys and a post-surveys face-to-face panel meeting held in Strasbourg, France.

resultsThe experts settled on the terms computer-assisted surgery and intervention, image-guided surgery and intervention, hybrid operating room, and guidance systems and agreed-upon definitions of these terms, with rates of consensus of more than 80% for each term. The methodology used proved to be a compelling strategy to overcome the current difficulties related to data growth rates and technological convergence in this field.

conclusionsOur multidisciplinary collaborative approach resulted in consensus definitions that may improve communication, knowledge transfer, collaboration, and research in the rapidly changing field of image-guided minimally invasive techniques.

Indexed as

computer assistanceguidance systemshybrid operating roomimage guidanceminimal invasion

Identifiers

PMID33392607
PMCPMC7771637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.