ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2020
Validation of two pediatric resuscitation tapes.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation of the Pediatric Advanced Weight Prediction in the Emergency Room Extra Large Mid-Arm Circumference scale in Turkish children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- Emergency medicine research in the Philippines: A scoping review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2023Article
- Validation of two pediatric resuscitation tapes.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to compare the actual weights of Filipino children with their estimated weights obtained from the Broselow tape and the Pediatric Advanced Weight Prediction in the Emergency Room eXtra Length-Mid-arm Circumference (PAWPER XL-MAC) tape.
methodsA prospective, observational, cross-sectional study conducted among Filipino children admitted at the Pediatric Emergency Department (ED) of The Medical City in Pasig City, Philippines. Mean percentage error (MPE) determined bias. Modified Bland-Altman analysis was used to perform a visual comparison of the bias and extent of agreement. The proportion of weight estimates within 10% (
resultsA total of 220 Filipino children (63.2% male) were recruited. Both the Broselow and PAWPER XL-MAC tapes overestimate the actual weight by an average of 0.4% (95% limit of agreement [LOA] -29.4 to 30.2) and 1.3% (95% LOA -15.3 to 17.9) respectively. Across body mass index (BMI) groups, both tapes overestimate (MPE: +19.2 and +9.3) weight among underweight children and underestimate (MPE: -13.2 and -3.5; MPE: -18.6 and -5.5) weight among overweight and obese children. In measuring estimated weight within 10% and 20% of actual weight, the PAWPER XL-MAC performed best (79.6% and 96.8%).
conclusionThe PAWPER XL-MAC tape performed better as a weight estimation tool compared to Broselow tape across different age groups and BMI-for-age groups of Filipino children. Both tapes tend to overestimate weight among younger and underweight children while underestimating weight among ages 7 to 10 years old, overweight, or obese children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.