ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2020
Vital sign monitoring during out-of-hospital pediatric advanced airway management.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vital sign monitoring during out-of-hospital pediatric advanced airway management.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate physiologic monitoring in pediatric patients undergoing out-of-hospital advanced airway management.
methodsRetrospective case series of pediatric patients (<18 years) with advanced airways placed in the out-of-hospital setting. Patients given cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or defibrillation before the first advanced airway attempt were excluded. Reviewers abstracted physiologic data from the patient monitor files and patient care reports. The primary outcome was the proportion of time pulse oximetry was in place during airway management. Other outcomes included the proportion of time ECG monitoring and waveform end-tidal capnography were in place as well as the incidence of oxygen desaturation events.
resultsWe evaluated 23 pediatric patients with a mean age of 10.7 years (SD 6.5). Eleven of 18 (61%) children with medication-facilitated intubation had pulse oximetry in place when the first medication was documented as given. Eight of 18 (44%) had ECG monitoring, 12 of 18 (66%) had waveform capnography, and 5 of 18 (28%) had a blood pressure check within the 3 minutes before receiving the first medication. In the 3-minute preoxygenation phase, pulse oximetry was in place for an average of 1.4 minutes (47%, SD 0.37) and a visible photoplethysmogram (PPG) waveform obtained from the pulse oximeter was present for 0.6 minutes (20%, SD 0.34). During airway device placement, pulse oximetry was in place 73% (SD 0.39) of the time and 30% (SD 0.41) of the time there was a visible PPG waveform.
conclusionsPediatric patients had critical deficits in physiologic monitoring during advanced airway management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.