Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33392562›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2020

Reducing infant catheterization in the emergency department through clean-catch urine collection.

Amanda E Mulcrone, Manas Parikh, Fahd A Ahmad

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06265142 (Clean Catch Urine Feasibility and Contamination Rate Compared to Bladder Catheterization Urine in Pre-Continent Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06265142 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Clean Catch Urine Feasibility and Contamination Rate Compared to Bladder Catheterization Urine in Pre-Continent Children: Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorOman Medical Speciality BoardRan2024 to 2024Enrolled80ConditionsUrinary Tract InfectionsArmsBladder catheterization, clean catch urine via bladder massage technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Reducing infant catheterization in the emergency department through clean-catch urine collection.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda E MulcroneDepartment of Pediatrics Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis St. Louis Missouri USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0167-8951
Manas ParikhDepartment of Pediatrics Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis St. Louis Missouri USA.
Fahd A AhmadDepartment of Pediatrics Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis St. Louis Missouri USA.
St. Louis Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur emergency department (ED) traditionally relied on urethral catheterization to obtain urine cultures when evaluating infants for urinary tract infections (UTIs). Catheterization is associated with adverse effects, and recent studies have demonstrated clean-catch urine methods can be successfully used to obtain urine cultures. We pursued a quality improvement (QI) initiative aimed at decreasing the frequency of urethral catheterizations in our ED by using an established clean-catch technique to obtain infant urine cultures.

methodsWe implemented a clean-catch urine collection method, which we entitled "Bladder Massage," for infants 0-6 months of age needing a urine culture in our ED. Exclusions included critical illness, known urologic abnormality, or prior UTI diagnosis. Our primary interventions were educational initiatives. We retrospectively collected data regarding the use of bladder massage. Our balancing measure was the contamination rate of urine cultures obtained via bladder massage technique compared to catheterization.

resultsIn our first-year post-implementation, we identified 334 eligible patients. Bladder massage was attempted on 136/334 (40.7%) eligible infants, with 87/136 (64%) successful attempts, thus avoiding catheterization in 26.1% of patients. Our baseline contamination rate from catheterization was 8/488 (1.6%), compared to 10/87 (12%) using bladder massage (

conclusionWe successfully introduced a method for clean-catch urine cultures in our pediatric ED, averting the need for urethral catheterization in many well-appearing infants. Ongoing efforts must focus on reduction of contamination in females, increased technique usage, and electronic health record changes to facilitate documentation to continue method use.

Identifiers

PMID33392562
PMCPMC7771792
OpenAlexW3055819652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.