ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2020
Antihypertensive use for stroke in United States emergency departments.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antihypertensive use for stroke in United States emergency departments.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTimely emergency department (ED) control of hypertension in the acute phase of stroke is associated with improved outcomes. It is unclear how emergency physicians use antihypertensive medications to treat severe hypertension associated with stroke. We sought to determine national patterns of antihypertensive use associated with ED visits for stroke in the United States.
methodsWe analyzed data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) 2008-2017. We included ED visits associated with ischemic stroke (ICD9 433-434, ICD10 I630-I639) or hemorrhagic stroke (ICD9 430-432, ICD10 I600-I629). We estimated the number and proportions of stroke ED visits with triage blood pressure meeting treatment thresholds (triage systolic blood pressure [SBP] ≥180 mm Hg). We identified the frequency of antihypertensive use, as well as the most commonly used agents.
resultsBetween 2008-2017, of a total 135,012,819 ED visits, 619,791 were associated with stroke (78.3% ischemic strokes and 21.7% hemorrhage strokes). Of all stroke visits, 21.8% received antihypertensive medications. Of the identified visits, 9.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 6.0%, 13.1%) ischemic stroke visits and 58.2% (95% CI = 49.0%, 66.9%) hemorrhagic stroke visits met criteria for BP reduction. A total of 47.6% (95% CI = 29.1%, 66.7%) of eligible ischemic stroke visits and 41.5% (95% CI = 30.5%, 53.3%) of eligible hemorrhagic strokes visits received antihypertensives. The most common agents used in ischemic stroke were beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, and ACE inhibitors. The most common agents used in hemorrhagic stroke included calcium-channel blockers, beta-blockers, and vasodilators.
conclusionIn this national sample, less than half of strokes presenting to the ED with hypertension received antihypertensive therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.