Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33392548›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2020

Portable, consumer-grade pulse oximeters are accurate for home and medical use: Implications for use in the COVID-19 pandemic and other resource-limited environments.

Walter A Schrading, Ben McCafferty, Jordan Grove, David B Page

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Influence of cuff pressures of automatic sphygmomanometers on pulse oximetry measurements.Measurement : journal of the International Measurement Confederation · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Walter A SchradingOffice of Wilderness Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8303-7882
Ben McCaffertyUniversity of Alabama School of Medicine Birmingham Alabama USA.
Jordan GroveUniversity of Alabama School of Medicine Birmingham Alabama USA.
David B PageDepartment of Medicine Division of Pulmonary Allergy and Critical Care Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the correlation between 3 lightweight portable pulse oximeter devices compared to a standard wall mount pulse oximetry device.

methodsWe performed a single-center, prospective, observational study of 4 pulse oximetry devices, 3 of which are commercially available to the public. A convenience sample of 200 emergency department (ED) patients with chief complaints of cardiopulmonary origin or a peripheral capillary oxygen saturation ≤ 94 percent were enrolled. Analysis of variance was performed to compare SpO2s and test characteristics of the 3 devices compared to control.

resultsAlthough differences in measured SpO2s were observed (

conclusionThe 3 commercially available devices were accurate enough to be clinically useful when compared to a hospital bedside monitor pulse oximeter. Consumer-grade portable pulse oximeters may be useful if overwhelming numbers of patients require oxygen saturation monitoring, such as during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID‐19/novel coronavirushypoxiaoxygenoxygenation statuspulse oximetryrespiratory physiological phenomena

Identifiers

PMID33392548
PMCPMC7771801
OpenAlexW3093770985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.