Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33392522›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2020

Patient feedback in the emergency department: A feasibility study of the Resident Communication Assessment Program (ReCAP).

Cameron Mozayan, Haley Manella, Erica Chimelski, Merisa Kline, Al'ai Alvarez, Michael A Gisondi, Stefanie S Sebok-Syer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cameron MozayanDepartment of Emergency Medicine Stanford University Palo Alto California USA.
Haley ManellaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University Stanford University Palo Alto California USA.
Erica ChimelskiStanford University Department of Emergency Medicine Stanford University Palo Alto California USA.
Merisa KlineService Excellence Physician Partnership and Patient Experience programs at Stanford Health Care Stanford California USA.
Al'ai AlvarezDepartment of Emergency Medicine Stanford University Palo Alto California USA.
Michael A GisondiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Precision Education and Assessment Research Lab Stanford University Palo Alto California USA.
Stefanie S Sebok-SyerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford University Palo Alto California USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveResident physicians must develop competence in interpersonal and communication skills, but workplace-based assessment of these skills remains challenging. We explored the feasibility of the Resident Communication Assessment Program (ReCAP) for eliciting patient feedback about resident physician communication in the emergency department (ED).

methodsThis study is a prospective, observational study conducted in the ED of a university-based hospital from December 2018 through April 2019. ReCAP is a program that interviews patients prior to discharge from the ED using the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT). CAT consists of 14 Likert style questions and 3 open-ended questions for patient feedback about residents' communication. Open-text, narrative responses from patients were coded using a modified version of the Completed Clinical Evaluation Report Rating tool.

resultsWe collected data from 42 subjects who completed the CAT, and provided 32 open-text, narrative responses about 20 resident physicians. Patient responses were overwhelmingly positive with 551/588 (94%) CAT responses scoring "Very Good," the highest category. Open-text, narrative comments analyzed using CCERR were unbalanced, favoring residents' strengths rather than areas for improvement. Patient comments offered more examples of strengths than weaknesses, and few subjects provided recommendations to improve resident performance.

conclusionReCAP represents a feasible method for eliciting patient feedback about resident communication skills in the ED. The CAT can be used to structure brief patient interviews by trained staff but generally elicits only positive feedback. Further studies are needed to identify more discriminatory assessment tools.

Indexed as

communicationeducationemergency medicinefeedbackmulti‐source feedbackpatient‐centeredpatient interview

Identifiers

PMID33392522
PMCPMC7771786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.