ArticleHealth policy OPEN2020
Building Capacity for Evidence-Informed Priority Setting in the Indian Health System: An International Collaborative Experience.
Article in Health policy OPEN, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research trends in total knee arthroplasty in India: a five-year bibliometric analysis.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Global partnerships for local impact: Strengthening HTA capacity in Asia and Africa through collaborative experiences.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- A Mixed-Methods Assessment of India's Health Technology Assessment Ecosystem.Applied health economics and health policy · 2026Article
- Developing a national framework for health technology assessment in Iran: a mixed-methods Delphi consensus study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Situation analysis of evidence-informed health decision-making in Lao PDR: the case of health technology assessment.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Article
- Public Health Strategies in the Face of Crisis: A Comprehensive Review of the Zika Outbreak in India.Cureus · 2024Review
- How Least Developed to Lower-Middle Income Countries Use Health Technology Assessment: A Scoping Review.Pathogens and global health · 2023Article
- Institutionalizing health technology assessment in Egypt: Situational analysis and roadmap.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Mapping of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) teaching and training initiatives: Landscape for evidence-based policy decisions in India.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
India's rapid economic growth has been accompanied by slower improvements in population health. Given the need to reconcile the ambitious goal of achieving Universal Coverage with limited resources, a robust priority-setting mechanism is required to ensure that the right trade-offs are made and the impact on health is maximised. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is endorsed by the World Health Assembly as the gold standard approach to synthesizing evidence systematically for evidence-informed priority setting (EIPS). India is formally committed to institutionalising HTA as an integral component of the EIPS process. The effective conduct and uptake of HTA depends on a well-functioning ecosystem of stakeholders adept at commissioning and generating policy-relevant HTA research, developing and utilising rigorous technical, transparent, and inclusive methods and processes, and a strong multisectoral and transnational appetite for the use of evidence to inform policy. These all require myriad complex and complementary capacities to be built at each level of the health system . In this paper we describe how a framework for targeted and locally-tailored capacity building for EIPS, and specifically HTA, was collaboratively developed and implemented by an international network of priority-setting expertise, and the Government of India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.