Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33392454›Full record

ReviewJOR spine2020

Electrospinning and 3D bioprinting for intervertebral disc tissue engineering.

Andrea De Pieri, Ann M Byerley, Catherine R Musumeci, Fatemeh Salemizadehparizi, Maya A Vanderhorst, Karin Wuertz-Kozak

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JOR spine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Andrea De PieriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) Rochester New York USA.
Ann M ByerleyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) Rochester New York USA.
Catherine R MusumeciDepartment of Biomedical Engineering Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) Rochester New York USA.
Fatemeh SalemizadehpariziDepartment of Biomedical Engineering Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) Rochester New York USA.
Maya A VanderhorstDepartment of Biomedical Engineering Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) Rochester New York USA.
Karin Wuertz-KozakDepartment of Biomedical Engineering Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) Rochester New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3281-4629
Rochester Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is a major cause of low back pain and represents a massive socioeconomic burden. Current conservative and surgical treatments fail to restore native tissue architecture and functionality. Tissue engineering strategies, especially those based on 3D bioprinting and electrospinning, have emerged as possible alternatives by producing cell-seeded scaffolds that replicate the structure of the IVD extracellular matrix. In this review, we provide an overview of recent advancements and limitations of 3D bioprinting and electrospinning for the treatment of IVD degeneration, focusing on future areas of research that may contribute to their clinical translation.

Indexed as

annulus fibrosusbioinkbiomaterialsendplateextracellular matrixMSCsnucleus pulposusstem cells

Identifiers

PMID33392454
PMCPMC7770193
OpenAlexW3048050467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.