Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33392448›Full record

ArticleJOR spine2020

Canine models of spine disorders.

Naomi N Lee, Jacob S Kramer, Aaron M Stoker, Chantelle C Bozynski, Cristi R Cook, James T Stannard, Theodore J Choma, James L Cook

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JOR spine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ovine models of intervertebral disc degeneration.Annals of translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Lateral fenestration of lumbar intervertebral discs in rabbits: development and characterisation of an in vivo preclinical model with multi-modal endpoint analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naomi N LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Missouri Columbia Missouri USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5399-7519
Jacob S KramerThompson Laboratory for Regenerative Orthopaedics University of Missouri Columbia Missouri USA.
Aaron M StokerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Missouri Columbia Missouri USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6403-3969
Chantelle C BozynskiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Missouri Columbia Missouri USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4755-867X
Cristi R CookDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Missouri Columbia Missouri USA.
James T StannardDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Missouri Columbia Missouri USA.
Theodore J ChomaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Missouri Columbia Missouri USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9194-8563
James L CookDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Missouri Columbia Missouri USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0862-995X
University of Missouri · US

Funding

Postdoctoral Training in Comparative MedicineT32OD011126 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI Elizabeth C Bryda, Aaron Ericsson · 2012 to 2026
$3.4M
NIH HHS T32 OD011126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neck and low back pain are common among the adult human population and impose large social and economic burdens on health care and quality of life. Spine-related disorders are also significant health concerns for canine companions with etiopathogeneses, clinical presentations, and diagnostic and therapeutic options that are very similar to their human counterparts. Historically, induced and spontaneous pathology in laboratory rodents, dogs, sheep, goats, pigs, and nonhuman primates have been used for study of human spine disorders. While each of these can serve as useful preclinical models, they all have inherent limitations. Spontaneously occurring spine disorders in dogs provide highly translatable data that overcome many of the limitations of other models and have the added benefit of contributing to veterinary healthcare as well. For this scoping review, peer-reviewed manuscripts were selected from PubMed and Google Scholar searches using keywords: "intervertebral disc," "intervertebral disc degeneration," "biomarkers," "histopathology," "canine," and "mechanism." Additional keywords such as "injury," "induced model," and "nucleus degeneration" were used to further narrow inclusion. The objectives of this review were to (a) outline similarities in key features of spine disorders between dogs and humans; (b) describe relevant canine models; and (c) highlight the applicability of these models for advancing translational research and clinical application for mechanisms of disease, diagnosis, prognosis, prevention, and treatment, with a focus on intervertebral disc degeneration. Best current evidence suggests that dogs share important anatomical, physiological, histological, and molecular components of spinal disorders in humans, such that induced and spontaneous canine models can be very effective for translational research. Taken together, the peer-reviewed literature supports numerous advantages for use of canine models for study of disorders of the spine when the potential limitations and challenges are addressed.

Indexed as

canine research modelsintervertebral disc degenerationspine pathologyspine‐related disorders

Identifiers

PMID33392448
PMCPMC7770205
OpenAlexW3045029504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.