Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33392400›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2021

Long-term follow up of a patient with a recurrent desmoid tumor that was successfully treated with proton beam therapy: A case report and literature review.

Takuya Sawada, Masashi Mizumoto, Yoshiko Oshiro, Haruko Numajiri, Shosei Shimizu, Yuichi Hiroshima, Masatoshi Nakamura, Takashi Iizumi, Toshiyuki Okumura, Hideyuki Sakurai

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takuya SawadaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Masashi MizumotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Yoshiko OshiroDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Haruko NumajiriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Shosei ShimizuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Yuichi HiroshimaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Masatoshi NakamuraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Takashi IizumiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Toshiyuki OkumuraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Hideyuki SakuraiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
University of Tsukuba Hospital · JPTsukuba Medical Center Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Desmoid tumors are benign, but may have a locally invasive tendency that commonly results in local recurrence. Most occur on the body trunk or extremities, whereas a head and neck desmoid tumor is relatively rare. The efficacy of radiotherapy has been suggested and 50-60 Gy is used for unresectable or recurrent desmoid tumors, but there are few reports of use of particle beam therapy. However, since this tumor occurs more often in younger patients compared to malignant tumors and the prognosis is favorable, there may be an advantage of this therapy. We treated a male patient with a head and neck recurrent desmoid tumor with proton beam therapy (PBT) at a dose of 60 Gy (RBE). This patient underwent surgical resection as initial treatment, but the tumor recurred only six months after surgery, and resection was performed again. After PBT, the tumor gradually shrank and complete remission has been achieved for 10 years without any severe late toxicity. Here, we report the details of this case, with a review of the literature. We suggest that PBT may reduce the incidence of second malignant tumors by reducing the dose exposure around the planning target volume.

Indexed as

Desmoid fibromatosisDesmoid tumorProton beam therapyRadiation

Identifiers

PMID33392400
PMCPMC7773558
OpenAlexW3111001627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.