ArticleHuman reproduction open2020
'Your hopes can run away with your realistic expectations': a qualitative study of women and men's decision-making when undergoing multiple cycles of IVF.
Article in Human reproduction open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of emotions on IVF/ICSI outcomes in infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Pooled it
- Health care experiences of individuals accessing or undergoingFrontiers in reproductive health · 2025Pooled it
- Driving factors in treatment decision-making of patients seeking medical assistance for infertility: a systematic review.Human reproduction update · 2024Pooled it
- Influence of Anecdotes of IVF Success on Treatment Decision Making: An Online Randomized Controlled Trial.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026Trial
- Live births after low initial β-hCG in IVF cycles: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Women's Lived Experiences of Decisional Conflict and Support Needs During First-Time Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatment: A Descriptive Phenomenological Study in China.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Cyclical grief in Israeli women after IVF and medical termination.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Patient-level cost analysis of subfertility pathways in the Dutch healthcare system.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025Article
- Deep learning classification integrating embryo images with associated clinical information from ART cycles.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Dreaming of motherhood: experiences of women who have undergone fertility treatment.Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria · 2025Article
- Assessment of patient preferences for assisted reproductive technology in China: a discrete choice experiment.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Representations of in vitro fertilization in the first cycle of IVF in women.Health psychology and behavioral medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Effect of Jawarish Amla Concoction on Controlling Stress in Women Candidate Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection orAdvanced biomedical research · 2025Article
- A heatmap for expected cumulative live birth rate in preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders and chromosomal structural rearrangements.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Policy action points and approaches to promote fertility care in The Gambia: Findings from a mixed-methods study.PloS one · 2024Article
- An insurmountable obstacle: Experiences of Chinese women undergoing in vitro fertilization.PloS one · 2024Article
- Decision regret among couples experiencing infertility: a mixed methods longitudinal cohort study.Reproductive health · 2023Article
- Hope and Exploitation in Commercial Provision of Assisted Reproductive Technologies.The Hastings Center report · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionWhat are the factors that contribute to the decision to continue or stop IVF treatment after multiple unsuccessful cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER: Factors contributing to the decision included external factors, such as their doctor's guidance, success rates, the outcomes of previous cycles and anecdotal stories of success, as well as emotional and cognitive drivers, including perception of success, hope and fear of regret. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Infertility affects about one in six Australian couples of reproductive age. Regarding IVF, some couples with a good prognosis drop out of treatment prematurely, whilst others continue for multiple cycles, despite limited chances of success. Little is known about what factors contribute to the decision to continue IVF after multiple failed cycles. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: Semi-structured face-to-face and telephone interviews were conducted with 22 participants. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically using Framework analysis. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING
methodsDoctors and nurses at an Australian private fertility clinic recruited individuals and/or couples who had undergone three or more complete unsuccessful cycles of IVF. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The majority of participants had decided to or were leaning towards continuing treatment. Participants expressed a range of common factors important in their decision-making, which were evident both within and across couples. For most, their doctor's advice and hope were key factors influencing their decision. Most participants expressed they would continue as long as there was a chance of success and until their doctor advised otherwise. Other factors included participants' perception of their likelihood of success, hearing anecdotal stories of success after multiple cycles, positive outcomes of previous cycles and fear of regret. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: The sample was highly educated and recruited from one private Australian fertility clinic only. Many participants were also couples, which may have resulted in more homogenous data as they shared the same diagnosis for infertility and outcomes of previous cycles. Factors influencing the decision to continue or stop may differ in different sociodemographic populations and in other healthcare systems. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsGiven the important role of the doctor's guidance and patients' own perceptions of their likelihood of success, which they tended to overestimate, it is vital that fertility specialists give accurate and transparent information regarding their likelihood of success and continue to regularly communicate this throughout the IVF journey. Anecdotal stories of success against the odds appeared to be influential in the decision to continue and underpinned unrealistic perceptions of possible success. More personalized, cumulative estimates of likelihood of success may help couples with their decision-making as well as with discussions about ending treatment or setting a limit before commencing IVF. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The study was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Program Grant (APP1113532). No further competing interests exist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.