ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2020
Farm animal contact is associated with progression to Hemolytic uremic syndrome in patients with Shiga toxin-producing
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Host-Pathogen Interactions during Shiga Toxin-ProducingMicroorganisms · 2024Review
- Farm animal exposure setting impacts hemolytic uremic syndrome risk among Shiga toxin-producingEpidemiology and infection · 2024Article
- Epidemiological Characterization of Isolates ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Risk Factors for Positivity to Shiga Toxin-ProducingInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a life-threatening complication of Shiga toxin-producing
methodsExposure data for laboratory-confirmed STEC cases among Indiana residents during 2012-2018 were retrieved. Logistic regression and mediation analysis were performed to determine the extent to which a history of direct contact with farm animals was associated with post-diarrheal HUS independent of age and mediated by
resultsA total of 784 STEC cases were retrieved. Of these, 46 (6%) developed HUS. Complete exposure data were available for 600 (77%) cases. A total of 24 (52%) HUS patients reported direct contact with farm animals, while 114 (21%) STEC patients who did not develop HUS reported this exposure. Among all STEC cases, HUS was associated with direct farm animal contact after adjusting for age (OR = 3.40, 95% CI: 1.81, 6.40). Detection of
conclusionsDirect farm animal contact was a risk factor for development of HUS among laboratory-confirmed STEC cases, independent of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.