ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020
Recent Progress on Chemical Production From Non-food Renewable Feedstocks Using
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sustainable production of glutaric acid in microbial cell factories: Current advances and future prospects.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026Review
- Tailoring Corynebacterium glutamicum for Sustainable Biomanufacturing: From Traditional to Cutting-Edge Technologies.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Review
- Obtaining PDC and other high-added value products from lignin byJournal of integrative bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Review of the Proteomics and Metabolic Properties ofMicroorganisms · 2024Review
- Rational Engineering of Non-Ubiquinone ContainingMetabolites · 2022Article
- Enhanced L-ornithine production from glucose and sucrose via manipulation of the fructose metabolic pathway in Corynebacterium glutamicum.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2022Article
- Application of Corynebacterium glutamicum engineering display system in three generations of biorefinery.Microbial cell factories · 2022Review
- Microbial Utilization of Next-Generation Feedstocks for the Biomanufacturing of Value-Added Chemicals and Food Ingredients.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- From Brown Seaweed to a Sustainable Microbial Feedstock for the Production of Riboflavin.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Genome-Scale Mining of Novel Anchor Proteins ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the non-renewable nature of fossil fuels, microbial fermentation is considered a sustainable approach for chemical production using glucose, xylose, menthol, and other complex carbon sources represented by lignocellulosic biomass. Among these, xylose, methanol, arabinose, glycerol, and other alternative feedstocks have been identified as superior non-food sustainable carbon substrates that can be effectively developed for microbe-based bioproduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.