Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33392030›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021

Evaluation of magnetic resonance image segmentation in brain low-grade gliomas using support vector machine and convolutional neural network.

Qifan Yang, Huijuan Zhang, Jun Xia, Xiaoliang Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Coupled stack-up volume RF coils for low-field open MR imaging.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qifan YangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, and School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Huijuan ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, and School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Jun XiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, and School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Xiaoliang ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, and School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Funding

Enhanced MR for morphological characterization of ligaments, tendons and boneU01EB023829 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LI, XIAOJUAN, ZHANG, XIAOLIANG · 2018 to 2024
$1.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB023829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImage segmentation of brain low-grade glioma (LGG) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contributes tremendously to diagnosis, classification and treatment of the disease. A tangible, accurate, reliable and fast image segmentation technique is demanded in clinical diagnosis and research.

methodsThe emerging machine learning technique has been demonstrated its unique capability in the field of medical image processing, including medical image segmentation. Support vector machine (SVM) and convolutional neural network (CNN) are two widely used machine learning methods. In this work, image segmentation tools based on SVM and CNN are developed and evaluated for brain LGG MR image segmentation studies. The segmentation performance in terms of accuracy and cost is quantitatively analyzed and compared between the SVM and CNN techniques developed.

resultsComputed on the Google CoLab, each of the 109 SVM models represents an individual patient, is trained using a single image of that patient and takes a few seconds to complete. The CNN model is trained on a drastically larger dataset of 19,760 data augmented images and takes approximately 2 hours to obtain the most optimal result. The SVM models achieved an average and median accuracy of 0.937 and 0.976 respectively, precision of 0.456 and 0.535 respectively, recall of 0.878 and 0.906 respectively, and F

conclusionsThis study shows that SVM with appropriate filtering techniques is capable of obtaining reliable and fast segmentation of brain LGG MR images with sufficient accuracy and limited image data. CNN technique outperforms SVM in the accuracy of segmentation with requirements of significantly enlarged data set, long computation time and high-performance computer.

Indexed as

convolutional neural network (CNN)image segmentationlow-grade glioma (LGG)machine learningMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)support vector machine (SVM)

Identifiers

PMID33392030
PMCPMC7719950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.