ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021
Evaluation of magnetic resonance image segmentation in brain low-grade gliomas using support vector machine and convolutional neural network.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Functional connectivity and graph theory of impaired central visual pathways in acute ischemic stroke based on functional magnetic resonance imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- A multimodal axial array resonator and its application in radiofrequency (RF) volume coil designs for low-field open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Segmentation of Low-Grade Brain Tumors Using Mutual Attention Multimodal MRI.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Coupled stack-up volume RF coils for low-field open MR imaging.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Deep learning based ultrasonic visualization of distal humeral cartilage for image-guided therapy: a pilot validation study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- MODILM: towards better complex diseases classification using a novel multi-omics data integration learning model.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Group theoretic particle swarm optimization for multi-level threshold lung cancer image segmentation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Detecting obstructive coronary artery disease with machine learning: rest-only gated single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging combined with coronary artery calcium score and cardiovascular risk factors.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Clinical evaluation of a novel atlas-based PET/CT brain image segmentation and quantification method for epilepsy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- AI-Driven Image Analysis in Central Nervous System Tumors-Traditional Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Hybrid Models.Journal of biotechnology and biomedicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImage segmentation of brain low-grade glioma (LGG) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contributes tremendously to diagnosis, classification and treatment of the disease. A tangible, accurate, reliable and fast image segmentation technique is demanded in clinical diagnosis and research.
methodsThe emerging machine learning technique has been demonstrated its unique capability in the field of medical image processing, including medical image segmentation. Support vector machine (SVM) and convolutional neural network (CNN) are two widely used machine learning methods. In this work, image segmentation tools based on SVM and CNN are developed and evaluated for brain LGG MR image segmentation studies. The segmentation performance in terms of accuracy and cost is quantitatively analyzed and compared between the SVM and CNN techniques developed.
resultsComputed on the Google CoLab, each of the 109 SVM models represents an individual patient, is trained using a single image of that patient and takes a few seconds to complete. The CNN model is trained on a drastically larger dataset of 19,760 data augmented images and takes approximately 2 hours to obtain the most optimal result. The SVM models achieved an average and median accuracy of 0.937 and 0.976 respectively, precision of 0.456 and 0.535 respectively, recall of 0.878 and 0.906 respectively, and F
conclusionsThis study shows that SVM with appropriate filtering techniques is capable of obtaining reliable and fast segmentation of brain LGG MR images with sufficient accuracy and limited image data. CNN technique outperforms SVM in the accuracy of segmentation with requirements of significantly enlarged data set, long computation time and high-performance computer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.