ArticleCureus2020
Proximal Arteriovenous Fistulas in Hemodialysis Patients: Advantages and Disadvantages.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe main objective of the present study is to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of proximal arteriovenous native fistulas. Hemodialysis is indispensable for patients with end-stage renal disease. For this purpose, arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are used. Among the native fistulas, distal radiocephalic AVF is the most preferred. However, brachiocephalic AVF (BCAVF) and brachiobasilic AVF with basilic vein transposition (basilic vein transposition arteriovenous fistula [BVTAVF]) can be used for a long time in dialysis patients whose distal vascular bed is depleted.
methodsThis is a retrospective study of 117 AVFs (BCAVF and BVTAVF), in patients with end-stage chronic renal disease, that were opened with a surgical technique (2012-2018). The postoperative two-year patency rates, AVF locations, complications, and the advantages and disadvantages of these fistulas are reviewed and recorded in the light of the literature.
resultsThe mean age of the patients (52 men and 65 women) was 60.6 ± 13.6 years. The percentages of primary patency rates at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months were 96.6%, 93.1%, 92%, 87.4%, and 82.8% in BCAVF patients, and 96.7%, 93.3%, 90%, 86.7%, and 80% in BVTAVF patients, respectively. The percentages of secondary patency rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 100%, 93.3%, and 86.7% in BCAVF patients, and 100%, 100% and 87.7% in BVTAVF patients, respectively. Fistula thrombosis was seen as the most common complication. The early complication was bleeding/hematoma. As late complications, we encountered steal syndrome, ischemic pain in the relevant extremity, pseudoaneurysm, and high-output heart failure.
conclusionProximal AVFs are preferable fistulas with early maturation and high primary patency rates. We believe that relatively high complications can be avoided by opening fistulas with an appropriate surgical technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.