Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33391698›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

The effects of taxonomy, diet, and ecology on the microbiota of riverine macroinvertebrates.

Shawn A Kroetsch, Karen A Kidd, Wendy A Monk, Joseph M Culp, Zacchaeus G Compson, Scott A Pavey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shawn A KroetschDepartment of Biological Sciences University of New Brunswick Saint John New Brunswick Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7806-6884
Karen A KiddDepartment of Biological Sciences University of New Brunswick Saint John New Brunswick Canada.
Wendy A MonkEnvironment and Climate Change Canada @ Canadian Rivers Institute Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management University of New Brunswick Fredericton New Brunswick Canada.
Joseph M CulpEnvironment and Climate Change Canada Department of Biology and Geography and Environmental Studies Wilfrid Laurier University Waterloo Ontario Canada.
Zacchaeus G CompsonEnvironment and Climate Change Canada @ Canadian Rivers Institute University of New Brunswick Fredericton New Brunswick Canada.
Scott A PaveyDepartment of Biological Sciences University of New Brunswick Saint John New Brunswick Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freshwater macroinvertebrates play key ecological roles in riverine food webs, such as the transfer of nutrients to consumers and decomposition of organic matter. Although local habitat quality drives macroinvertebrate diversity and abundance, little is known about their microbiota. In most animals, the microbiota provides benefits, such as increasing the rate at which nutrients are metabolized, facilitating immune system development, and defending against pathogenic attack. Our objectives were to identify the bacteria within aquatic invertebrates and determine whether their composition varied with taxonomy, habitat, diet, and time of sample collection. In 2016 and 2017, we collected 264 aquatic invertebrates from the mainstem Saint John (Wolastoq) River in New Brunswick, Canada, representing 15 orders. We then amplified the V3-V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene within each individual, which revealed nearly 20,000 bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs). The microbiota across all aquatic invertebrates were dominated by Proteobacteria (69.25% of the total sequence reads), but they differed significantly in beta diversity, both among host invertebrate taxa (genus-, family-, and order-levels) and temporally. In contrast to previous work, we observed no microbiota differences among functional feeding groups or traditional feeding habits, and neither water velocity nor microhabitat type structured microbiota variability. Our findings suggest that host invertebrate taxonomy was the most important factor in modulating the composition of the microbiota, likely through a combination of vertical and horizontal bacterial transmission, and evolutionary processes. This is one of the most comprehensive studies of freshwater invertebrate microbiota to date, and it underscores the need for future studies of invertebrate microbiota evolution and linkages to environmental bacteria and physico-chemical conditions.

Indexed as

bacterial diversityfreshwater aquatic invertebrateinvertebrate‐microbe interactionsmicrobial ecologymicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID33391698
PMCPMC7771166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.