Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33391020›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2020

Coronary Angiography-Derived Index of Microvascular Resistance.

Hu Ai, Yundi Feng, Yanjun Gong, Bo Zheng, Qinhua Jin, Hui-Ping Zhang, Fucheng Sun, Jianping Li, Yundai Chen, Yunlong Huo and 1 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04825028 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Diagnostic Value of Angiography-derived Index of Microvascular Resistance in Coronary Artery Disease Patients and Its Prognostic Implication After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

TypeobservationalSponsorShanghai Zhongshan HospitalRan2021 to 2021Enrolled271ConditionsCoronary Microvascular Dysfunction, Myocardial IschemiaArmsAngiography-drived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance
NCT05009667 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Multi-center Clinical Trial for Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Coronary Angiography-Derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance Measured Online by a Coronary Functional Measurement System

TypeobservationalSponsorGe JunboRan2021 to 2021Enrolled116ConditionsCoronary Microvascular DysfunctionArmsAngiography-derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance, Pressure wire-based Index of Microcirculatory Resistance
NCT06118450 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Multi-center Clinical Trial for Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Online Coronary Angiography-Derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in STEMI Patients (Flash IV)

TypeobservationalSponsorThe Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled335ConditionsMicrovascular Coronary Artery Disease, STEMIArmsNon-intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Angiography-based coronary microvascular assessment with and without intracoronary pressure measurements: a systematic review.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Microvascular Dysfunction in MINOCA: Still a Moving Target.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Prognostic impact of angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Hu AiDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yundi FengPKU-HKUST Shenzhen-Hong Kong Institution, Shenzhen, China.
Yanjun GongDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Bo ZhengDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qinhua JinDepartment of Cardiovascular, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hui-Ping ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.
Fucheng SunDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jianping LiDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yundai ChenDepartment of Cardiovascular, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yunlong HuoPKU-HKUST Shenzhen-Hong Kong Institution, Shenzhen, China.
Yong HuoDepartment of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Beijing Hospital · CNPeking University · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNHong Kong University of Science and Technology · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A coronary angiography-derived index of microvascular resistance (caIMR) is proposed for physiological assessment of microvasular diseases in coronary circulation. The aim of the study is to assess diagnostic performance of caIMR, using wire-derived index of microvascular resistance (IMR) as the reference standard. IMR was demonstrated in 56 patients (57 vessels) with stable/unstable angina pectoris and no obstructive coronary arteries in three centers using the Certus pressure wire. Based on the aortic pressure wave and coronary angiograms from two projections, the caIMR was computed and assessed in blinded fashion against the IMR at an independent core laboratory. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the caIMR with a cutoff value of 25 were 84.2% (95% CI: 72.1% to 92.5%), 86.1% (95% CI: 70.5% to 95.3%), 81.0% (95% CI: 58.1% to 94.6%), 88.6% (95% CI: 76.1% to 95.0%), and 77.3% (95% CI: 59.5% to 88.7%) against the IMR with a cutoff value of 25. The receiver-operating curve had area under the curve of 0.919 and the correlation coefficient equaled to 0.746 between caIMR and wire-derived IMR. Hence, caIMR could eliminate the need of a pressure wire, reduce technical error, and potentially increase adoption of physiological assessment of microvascular diseases in patients with ischemic heart disease.

Indexed as

computational fluid dynamics (CFD)fractional flow reserve (FFR)hemodynamicsindex of microcirculatory resistanceinstantaneous wave–free ratio (IFR)

Identifiers

PMID33391020
PMCPMC7772433
OpenAlexW3113309807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.