Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33390895›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2020

Arbitration of Approach-Avoidance Conflict by Ventral Hippocampus.

Kathleen G Bryant, Jacqueline M Barker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Targeting the 5-HTCell & bioscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prefrontal Cortical Control of Anxiety: Recent Advances.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kathleen G BryantDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Jacqueline M BarkerDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Funding

Integrating preclinical models to develop converging mechanistic data in co-occurring HIV and substance useDP2DA051907 · NIDA · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI BARKER, JACQUELINE M · 2020 to 2022
$2.5M
Arbitration Between Goal-directed and Habitual Ethanol Seeking by the Nucleus Accumbens Shell.R00AA024499 · NIAAA · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI BARKER, JACQUELINE M · 2018 to 2020
$747k
Sex differences in regulation of reinstatement of ethanol seeking by nucleus accumbens glutamate signalingR21AA027629 · NIAAA · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI BARKER, JACQUELINE M · 2020 to 2021
$397k
Low dose ethanol effects on reward learning and motivationF31AA029621 · NIAAA · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI BRYANT, KATHLEEN GRACE · 2021 to 2022
$93k
NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA029621NIAAA NIH HHS R00 AA024499NIAAA NIH HHS R21 AA027629NIDA NIH HHS DP2 DA051907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When environmental cues or stimuli that represent both rewarding and aversive outcomes are presented, complex computations must be made in order to determine whether approach or avoidance is the better behavioral strategy. In many neuropsychiatric illnesses these computations can be skewed. In some instances, circumstances that may normally warrant avoidance instead promote approach, thus producing compulsive-like behavioral strategies that are inflexible in response to new or conflicting information. Alternatively, high sensitivity to aversion or low sensitivity to reward can result in the failure to achieve goals and loss of resilience that characterizes depressive disorders. Increases in compulsive-like behavior have been found to be associated with disrupted signaling in regions that regulate response to conflicting stimuli, including the hippocampus. Classic behavioral inhibition theories of hippocampus function in anxiety suggest that the hippocampus blocks aberrant behavior in response to anxiety related cues or stimuli. The hippocampus may act to block approach in the face of conflicting stimuli. Dysregulations of hippocampal function, as may be present in neuropsychiatric disorders, may therefore promote aberrant approach behavior. The ventral hippocampus (vHPC) subregion is key for coordinating this approach/avoidance conflict resolution, likely through its participation with cortico-striatal and mesolimbic circuits. We revisit Gray's behavioral inhibition theory of HPC function, first posited in the 1980s, and interpret in the context of new knowledge on vHPC function gained through modern technology. Taken together with the extant, classical literature on hippocampal function, we propose that these new findings suggest that vHPC circuits balance behavioral response to conflicting stimuli in a manner that is both state- and context-dependent and, further, that disruption of specific vHPC circuits tips the balance in favor of biased approach or avoidance behavioral strategies.

Indexed as

arbitrationconflictfearrewardventral hippocampus (vHPC)

Identifiers

PMID33390895
PMCPMC7773818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.