ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020
Investigation of Deep-Learning-Driven Identification of Multiple Sclerosis Patients Based on Susceptibility-Weighted Images Using Relevance Analysis.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis Using Multimodal Deep Learning Integrating Lesion and Normal-Appearing White Matter: A Retrospective Study with International Multicentre External Validation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Applicability study of AI attribution methods for ophthalmic image classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Current and future role of MRI in the diagnosis and prognosis of multiple sclerosis.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2024Review
- Predicting disease-related MRI patterns of multiple sclerosis through GAN-based image editing.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Article
- Present and future of the diagnostic work-up of multiple sclerosis: the imaging perspective.Journal of neurology · 2023Review
- Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in radiology and nuclear medicine: a literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning: Challenges and Opportunities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Investigation of biases in convolutional neural networks for semantic segmentation using performance sensitivity analysis.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2022Article
- Role of artificial intelligence in MS clinical practice.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2022Review
- Emerging deep learning techniques using magnetic resonance imaging data applied in multiple sclerosis and clinical isolated syndrome patients (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Review
- Multimodal magnetic resonance imaging analysis in the characteristics of Wilson's disease: A case report and literature review.Open life sciences · 2021Article
- Machine Learning Approaches in Study of Multiple Sclerosis Disease Through Magnetic Resonance Images.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Deep learning interpretability in neuroimaging: A comprehensive survey and methodological recommendations.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) is usually based on clinical symptoms and signs of damage to the central nervous system, which is assessed using magnetic resonance imaging. The correct interpretation of these data requires excellent clinical expertise and experience. Deep neural networks aim to assist clinicians in identifying MS using imaging data. However, before such networks can be integrated into clinical workflow, it is crucial to understand their classification strategy. In this study, we propose to use a convolutional neural network to identify MS patients in combination with attribution algorithms to investigate the classification decisions. The network was trained using images acquired with susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), which is known to be sensitive to the presence of paramagnetic iron components and is routinely applied in imaging protocols for MS patients. Different attribution algorithms were used to the trained network resulting in heatmaps visualizing the contribution of each input voxel to the classification decision. Based on the quantitative image perturbation method, we selected DeepLIFT heatmaps for further investigation. Single-subject analysis revealed veins and adjacent voxels as signs for MS, while the population-based study revealed relevant brain areas common to most subjects in a class. This pattern was found to be stable across different echo times and also for a multi-echo trained network. Intensity analysis of the relevant voxels revealed a group difference, which was found to be primarily based on the T1w magnitude images, which are part of the SWI calculation. This difference was not observed in the phase mask data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.