Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3339086›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology1988

The polarity and stability of microtubule capture by the kinetochore.

P Huitorel, M W Kirschner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 1988. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Kinetochores get a grip!The Journal of cell biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Self-organized optical device driven by motor proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  5. Biophysics of mitosis.Quarterly reviews of biophysics · 2012
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Making first contacts between the spindle and the chromosomes in HeLa cells.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 1994
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

P HuitorelDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco 94143-0448.
M W Kirschner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have studied the capture of microtubules by isolated metaphase chromosomes, using microtubules stabilized with taxol and marked with biotin tubulin to distinguish their plus and minus ends. The capture reaction is reversible at both the plus and minus ends. The on rate of capture is the same for both polarities but the dissociation rate from the kinetochore is seven times slower with microtubules captured at their plus ends than those captured at their minus ends. At steady state this disparity in off rates leads to the gradual replacement of microtubules captured at their minus ends with those captured at their plus ends. These results suggest that the kinetochore makes a lateral attachment near the end of the microtubule in the initial capture reaction and shows a structural specificity that may be important in proper bipolar attachment of the chromosome to the spindle.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphateAnimalsCell-Free SystemCentromereChromosomesCricetinaeIn Vitro TechniquesMicrotubulesMitosisProtein BindingSpindle ApparatusAdenosine Triphosphate

Identifiers

PMID3339086
PMCPMC2114942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.