ArticleHealth and human rights2020
Analyzing the Human Rights Impact of Increased Digital Public Health Surveillance during the COVID-19 Crisis.
Article in Health and human rights, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health Data Protection and Governance Under the Kenya-US Health Agreement.Health and human rights · 2026Article
- Data and Information Privacy as a Human Right: A Qualitative Study of its Perceived Impact on Mental Health.Journal for person-oriented research · 2026Article
- Four Key Questions to Guide Human Rights-based Social Listening during Infodemics.Asian bioethics review · 2025Article
- Coding the future: digital technologists and the constitution of the next system.Frontiers in sociology · 2025Article
- Post-COVID pandemic: The new normal and aftermath.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
- FDA launches health care at home initiative to drive equity in digital medical care.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Colonialism in the new digital health agenda.BMJ global health · 2024Review
- Changes to Public Health Surveillance Methods Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024Article
- Digital Democracy and Emergency Preparedness: Engaging the Public in Public Health.International journal of public health · 2024Article
- Physician perceptions of surveillance: Wearables, Apps, and Chatbots for COVID-19.Digital medicine · 2022Article
- Delineating privacy aspects of COVID tracing applications embedded with proximity measurement technologies & digital technologies.Technology in society · 2022Article
- Surveillance and pandemic governance in least-ideal contexts: The Philippine case.Journal of contingencies and crisis management · 2022Article
- How is "solidarity" understood in discussions about contact tracing apps? An overview.Frontiers in public health · 2022Review
- From dichotomisation towards intersectionality in addressing covid-19.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Article
- Digital Health during COVID-19: Informatics Dialogue with the World Health Organization.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2021Article
- Fulfilling the promise of digital health interventions (DHI) to promote women's sexual, reproductive and mental health in the aftermath of COVID-19.Reproductive health · 2021Article
- Health systems resilience in managing the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from 28 countries.Nature medicine · 2021Review
- The influencing factors of digital health passport adoption and acceptance during COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has led policy makers to expand traditional public health surveillance to take advantage of new technologies, such as tracking apps, to control the spread of SARS-CoV-2. This article explores the human rights dimensions of how these new surveillance technologies are being used and assesses the extent to which they entail legitimate restrictions to a range of human rights, including the rights to health, life, and privacy. We argue that human rights offer a crucial framework for protecting the public from regulatory overreach by ensuring that digital health surveillance does not undermine fundamental features of democratic society. First, we describe the surveillance technologies being used to address COVID-19 and reposition these technologies within the evolution of public health surveillance tools and the emergence of discussions concerning the compatibility of such tools with human rights. We then evaluate the potential human rights implications of the surveillance tools being used today by analyzing the extent to which they pass the tests of necessity and proportionality enshrined in international human rights law. We conclude by recommending ways in which the harmful human rights effects associated with these technologies might be reduced and public trust in their use enhanced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33390688PMC7762901What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.