Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33390600›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne2021

A comparison of 4 iron supplementation protocols to protect suckling piglets from anemia.

Robert Friendship, Victoria Seip, Rocio Amezcua

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert FriendshipDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Friendship, Amezcua); Grand Valley Fortifiers, Cambridge, Ontario N1R 5W6 (Seip).
Victoria SeipDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Friendship, Amezcua); Grand Valley Fortifiers, Cambridge, Ontario N1R 5W6 (Seip).
Rocio AmezcuaDepartment of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Friendship, Amezcua); Grand Valley Fortifiers, Cambridge, Ontario N1R 5W6 (Seip).
University of Guelph · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pigs are routinely supplemented with iron during the suckling period to prevent anemia, but recent studies have shown that despite iron treatment many fast-growing pigs are iron deficient at weaning. The objective of this study was to determine if oral iron supplementation provided free-choice from a week of age until weaning could prevent iron deficiency. Results showed that the industry standard treatment of a single iron injection at 4 days of age did not always prevent iron deficiency at weaning, indicating the need to provide additional iron to fast-growing suckling pigs either orally or by a second injection. It appears that providing piglets daily access to iron-enriched peat moss or injecting a second 200-mg dose of iron intramuscularly are both effective in meeting the piglets iron requirements during the suckling period.

Indexed as

AnemiaSwine DiseasesAnimalsAnimals, SucklingDietary SupplementsIronSwineWeaningIron

Identifiers

PMID33390600
PMCPMC7739385
OpenAlexW3119212386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.