Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33389931›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of ophthalmology2020

Prognostic Factors Affecting Graft Survival in Patients Undergoing Penetrating Keratoplasty for Infectious Keratitis.

Gülşah Gümüş, Ahmet Kırgız, Yusuf Yıldırım, Nilay Kandemir Beşek, Selim Genç, Burçin Kepez Yıldız, Muhittin Taşkapılı

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gülşah GümüşUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey İstanbul Beyoğlu Ophthalmology Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1954-2400
Ahmet KırgızUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey İstanbul Beyoğlu Ophthalmology Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7498-3693
Yusuf YıldırımUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey İstanbul Beyoğlu Ophthalmology Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4161-0919
Nilay Kandemir BeşekUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey İstanbul Beyoğlu Ophthalmology Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5784-9895
Selim GençUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey İstanbul Beyoğlu Ophthalmology Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-3049-2571
Burçin Kepez YıldızUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey İstanbul Beyoğlu Ophthalmology Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-5977-2601
Muhittin TaşkapılıUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey İstanbul Beyoğlu Ophthalmology Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3089-7782
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the prognostic factors affecting graft survival in patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) for infectious keratitis. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent PKP for keratitis in our hospital between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent therapeutic PKP at the inflammatory stage and were followed for at least 12 months were included in the study. Age, gender, follow-up period, time between diagnosis and surgery, lens status, presence of limbal involvement, presence of corneal ulceration, perforation, or corneal abscess, type of microorganism detected in culture, number of fortified medications used before surgery and duration of use, preoperative and postoperative visual acuity, postoperative graft transparency, postoperative complications, recurrence of infection, rate of re-keratoplasty, and indication for and timing of re-keratoplasty were recorded. The relationship between these findings and anatomic, therapeutic, and functional success were evaluated. Results: Fifty-nine patients were included in the study; 40 (67.8%) were male and 19 (32.2%) were female, and the mean age was 59.78±19.46 (6-91) years. Anatomic success was achieved in 58 patients (98.3%). Therapeutic success was achieved in 47 patients (79.7%) and there was a significant relationship between therapeutic success and re-keratoplasty and early re-keratoplasty (p<0.001 for both). Thirty-two patients (54.2%) had functional success and there was a significant relationship between the absence of postoperative complications and functional success (p=0.014). Conclusion: PKP is an effective treatment option in treatment-resistant keratitis or keratitis with impending perforation. The absence of postoperative complications and performing early re-keratoplasty in patients with recurrence increase the success rate.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildCorneaEye Infections, BacterialEye Infections, FungalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGraft SurvivalHumansKeratitisKeratoplasty, PenetratingMaleMiddle Agedgraft survivalInfectious keratitispenetrating keratoplasty

Identifiers

PMID33389931
PMCPMC7802093
OpenAlexW3115791725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.