Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33389919›Full record

ReviewNeurointervention2021

Obesity and Stroke: Does the Paradox Apply for Stroke?

Gabriel A Quiñones-Ossa, Carolina Lobo, Ezequiel Garcia-Ballestas, William A Florez, Luis Rafael Moscote-Salazar, Amit Agrawal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurointervention, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabriel A Quiñones-OssaFaculty of Medicine, University El Bosque, Bogota, Colombia.
Carolina LoboFaculty of Medicine, University El Bosque, Bogota, Colombia.
Ezequiel Garcia-BallestasConsejo Latinoamericano de Neurointensivismo (CLaNi), Cartagena, Colombia.
William A FlorezConsejo Latinoamericano de Neurointensivismo (CLaNi), Cartagena, Colombia.
Luis Rafael Moscote-SalazarConsejo Latinoamericano de Neurointensivismo (CLaNi), Cartagena, Colombia.
Amit AgrawalDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, obesity has been identified as one of the most important risk factors for developing cardiovascular diseases including stroke; however, a theory called "The Obesity Paradox" has been recently considered. The paradoxical theory is that obese or overweight patients (according to body mass index score) can have better outcomes compared to leaner or malnourished patients. The paradox was initially discovered in patients with heart failure. The purpose of this manuscript was to investigate whether this paradox also applies to stroke patients, according to information available in the current literature.

Indexed as

Body mass indexCerebrovascular diseaseObesityStroke

Identifiers

PMID33389919
PMCPMC7946563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.