Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33389676›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2021

Auditory attentional filter in the absence of masking noise.

Elan Selvi Anandan, Ruby Husain, Kumar Seluakumaran

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elan Selvi AnandanDepartment of Physiology, University of Malaya Faculty of Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Ruby HusainDepartment of Physiology, University of Malaya Faculty of Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Kumar SeluakumaranDepartment of Physiology, University of Malaya Faculty of Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. kumarselvakumaran@um.edu.my.

Funding

Postgraduate Research Grant (PPP), University Malaya PG143-2015A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Signals containing attended frequencies are facilitated while those with unexpected frequencies are suppressed by an auditory filtering process. The neurocognitive mechanism underlying the auditory attentional filter is, however, poorly understood. The olivocochlear bundle (OCB), a brainstem neural circuit that is part of the efferent system, has been suggested to be partly responsible for the filtering via its noise-dependent antimasking effect. The current study examined the role of the OCB in attentional filtering, particularly the validity of the antimasking hypothesis, by comparing attentional filters measured in quiet and in the presence of background noise in a group of normal-hearing listeners. Filters obtained in both conditions were comparable, suggesting that the presence of background noise is not crucial for attentional filter generation. In addition, comparison of frequency-specific changes of the cue-evoked enhancement component of filters in quiet and noise also did not reveal any major contribution of background noise to the cue effect. These findings argue against the involvement of an antimasking effect in the attentional process. Instead of the antimasking effect mediated via medial olivocochlear fibers, results from current and earlier studies can be explained by frequency-specific modulation of afferent spontaneous activity by lateral olivocochlear fibers. It is proposed that the activity of these lateral fibers could be driven by top-down cortical control via a noise-independent mechanism. SIGNIFICANCE: The neural basis for auditory attentional filter remains a fundamental but poorly understood area in auditory neuroscience. The efferent olivocochlear pathway that projects from the brainstem back to the cochlea has been suggested to mediate the attentional effect via its noise-dependent antimasking effect. The current study demonstrates that the filter generation is mostly independent of the background noise, and therefore is unlikely to be mediated by the olivocochlear brainstem reflex. It is proposed that the entire cortico-olivocochlear system might instead be used to alter the hearing sensitivity during focus attention via frequency-specific modulation of afferent spontaneous activity.

Indexed as

CochleaNoiseAcoustic StimulationAttentionAuditory PathwaysHearingHumansAttention: Neural mechanismsAttention: SelectiveAuditory efferentHearingOlivocochlear

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.