ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2021
Comparison of a novel preperitoneal sublay repair with traditional onlay repair of morgagni hernia: a tale of two techniques.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic transabdominal preperitoneal Morgagni hernia repair: surgical technique.Journal of visualized surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Morgagni hernia (MH) is a rare diaphragmatic hernia which needs surgical repair. The conventional reconstruction involves reduction of hernia, closure of the defect and placement of an intraperitoneal onlay mesh often using robotic platform for ease of dissection and suturing the mesh (r-IPOM). We propose a novel robotic preperitoneal repair (r-TAPP) of MH in four cases and compare them with conventional r-IPOM technique. Between August 2017 and August 2020 nine patients underwent repair of MH. Five cases underwent repair by r-IPOM (group I). For the other four cases, r-TAPP was used (group II). Among the nine cases, the mean age was 53 years in group I and 55 years in group II, mean defect size was 33 mm in group I and 55 mm in group II. Operative time was longer in group II compared to group I (220 min vs 135 min, p = 0.022). Mean length of hospital stay was 1.3 days in group I compared to group II (4.5 and 4.5 vs 1.3 days, p = 0.03). There was statistically significant difference in reduced post-operative pain and time to return to work in group II compared to group I. There was no difference in complications, 30-day readmissions or recurrence of hernia between the two groups. We conclude that compared to the conventional r-IPOM repair, the r-TAPP technique is associated with less pain, early discharge, and faster return to work, translating into overall cost savings for the hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.