Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33389609›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2021

Predicting mortality, thrombus recurrence and persistence in patients with post-acute myocardial infarction left ventricular thrombus.

Wesley Yeung, Ching-Hui Sia, Tom Pollard, Aloysius Sheng-Ting Leow, Benjamin Yong-Qiang Tan, Rajinderdeep Kaur, Tiong-Cheng Yeo, Edgar Lik-Wui Tay, Leonard Leong-Litt Yeo, Mark Yan-Yee Chan and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prognostic Value of Machine Learning in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Wesley Yeung *University Medicine Cluster, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Singapore. wesley_yeung@nuhs.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3224-8954
Ching-Hui Sia *Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Tom PollardLaboratory for Computational Physiology, Harvard-MIT Health Sciences & Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Aloysius Sheng-Ting LeowUniversity Medicine Cluster, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Singapore.
Benjamin Yong-Qiang TanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Rajinderdeep KaurDepartment of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Tiong-Cheng YeoDepartment of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Edgar Lik-Wui TayDepartment of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Leonard Leong-Litt YeoYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Mark Yan-Yee ChanDepartment of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Joshua Ping-Yun LohDepartment of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

National Medical Research Council NMRC/CG/C026/2017_NUHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a common complication of acute myocardial infarction and is associated with morbidity from embolic complications. Predicting which patients will develop death or persistent LVT despite anticoagulation may help clinicians identify high-risk patients. We developed a random forest (RF) model that predicts death or persistent LVT and evaluated its performance. This was a single-center retrospective cohort study in an academic tertiary center. We included 244 patients with LVT in our study. Patients who did not receive anticoagulation (n = 8) or had unknown (n = 31) outcomes were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of death, recurrent LVT and persistent LVT. We selected a total of 31 predictors collected at the point of LVT diagnosis based on clinical relevance. We compared conventional regularized logistic regression with the RF algorithm. There were 156 patients who had resolution of LVT and 88 patients who experienced the composite outcome. The RF model achieved better performance and had an AUROC of 0.700 (95% CI 0.553-0.863) on a validation dataset. The most important predictors for the composite outcome were receiving a revascularization procedure, lower visual ejection fraction (EF), higher creatinine, global wall motion abnormality, higher prothrombin time, higher body mass index, higher activated partial thromboplastin time, older age, lower lymphocyte count and higher neutrophil count. The RF model accurately identified patients with post-AMI LVT who developed the composite outcome. Further studies are needed to validate its use in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Myocardial InfarctionThrombosisAgedAnticoagulantsHumansRetrospective StudiesVentricular Function, LeftAnticoagulantsLeft ventricular thrombusMyocardial infarctionPrediction model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.