Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33389580›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Ozone potential to fight against SAR-COV-2 pandemic: facts and research needs.

Angeles Blanco, Francisco de Borja Ojembarrena, Bernardino Clavo, Carlos Negro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Mask disinfection using atmospheric pressure cold plasma.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Ozone Eliminates SARS-CoV-2 from Difficult-to-Clean Office Supplies and Clinical Equipment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Angeles BlancoChemical Engineering and Materials Department, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avda. Complutense s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain. ablanco@ucm.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6820-7698
Francisco de Borja OjembarrenaChemical Engineering and Materials Department, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avda. Complutense s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Bernardino ClavoResearch Unit, Chronic Pain Unit, Dr. Negrín University Hospital, Calle Barranco de la Ballena, s/n, 35019, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Carlos NegroChemical Engineering and Materials Department, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avda. Complutense s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

Comunidad de Madrid S2018/EMT-4459Instituto de Salud Carlos III Grant COV20/00702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The greatest challenge the world is facing today is to win the battle against COVID-19 pandemic as soon as possible. Until a vaccine is available, personal protection, social distancing, and disinfection are the main tools against SARS-CoV-2. Although it is quite infectious, the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself is an enveloped virus that is relatively fragile because its protective fatty layer is sensitive to heat, ultraviolet radiation, and certain chemicals. However, heat and liquid treatments can damage some materials, and ultraviolet light is not efficient in shaded areas, so other disinfection alternatives are required to allow safe re-utilization of materials and spaces. As of this writing, evidences are still accumulating for the use of ozone gas as a disinfectant for sanitary materials and ambient disinfection in indoor areas. This paper reviews the most relevant results of virus disinfection by the application of gaseous ozone. The review covers disinfection treatments of both air and surfaces carried out in different volumes, which varies from small boxes and controlled chambers to larger rooms, as a base to develop future ozone protocols against COVID-19. Published papers have been critically analyzed to evaluate trends in the required ozone dosages, as a function of relative humidity (RH), contact time, and viral strains. The data have been classified depending on the disinfection objective and the volume and type of the experimental set-up. Based on these data, conservative dosages and times to inactivate the SARS-CoV-2 are estimated. In small chambers, 10-20 mg ozone/m

Indexed as

COVID-19OzoneDisinfectionHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Ultraviolet RaysOzoneCoronavirusCOVID-19DisinfectionsHeat & liquid sensitive materialsOzone gasSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33389580
PMCPMC7778500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.