Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33389488›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2021

Cross-cultural adaptation into French and validation of the SCAR-Q questionnaire.

Thomas Radulesco, Julien Mancini, Martin Penicaud, Jean-Jacques Grob, Marie-Aleth Richard, Patrick Dessi, Nausicaa Malissen, Justin Michel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Cross-cultural adaptation of the CRS-PRO questionnaire into French.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2023
    Article
  6. Reliability and validity of the simplified Chinese version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Immune Checkpoint Modulator.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thomas Radulesco *Aix Marseille Univ, APHM, IUSTI, Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, La Conception University Hospital, Marseille, France. Thomas.radulesco@ap-hm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5939-5372
Julien Mancini *Department of Public Health (BIOSTIC), Aix-Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, APHM, UMR1252, SESSTIM, Aix-Marseille University, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France.
Martin Penicaud *APHM, Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, La Conception University Hospital, 13385, Marseille Cedex, France.
Jean-Jacques Grob *Department of Dermatology and Skin Cancer, INSERM, CRCM, APHM, CHU Timone, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Marie-Aleth Richard *Dermatology Department, CEReSS-EA 3279, Research Centrer in Health Services and Quality of Life Aix Marseille University, Universitary Hospital Timone, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, APHM, 13385, Marseille, France.
Patrick Dessi *APHM, Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, La Conception University Hospital, 13385, Marseille Cedex, France.
Nausicaa Malissen *Department of Dermatology and Skin Cancer, INSERM, CRCM, APHM, CHU Timone, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Justin Michel *Aix Marseille Univ, APHM, IUSTI, Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, La Conception University Hospital, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMost questionnaires designed to evaluate patient-reported outcomes regarding scarring are available in English. The objective was to generate a validated French version of the SCAR-Q questionnaire.

methodsThe SCAR-Q questionnaire (including Appearance, Symptom and Psychological impact scales) was translated into French using a translation-back-translation process in accordance with international guidelines (ISPOR and WHO). For validation, two hundred patients consulting in our tertiary center completed the questionnaire. We tested scale reliability (Cronbach's α), floor/ceiling effects and item redundancy (inter-item correlations). Structural validity was tested using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with the robust weighted least squares (WLSMV) estimator and Delta parameterization. Model fit was examined using the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), the comparative fit index (CFI) and the Tucker-Lewis index (TLI). Correlations between scales and scale repeatability were tested (Spearman coefficient, Intra-class-coefficient).

resultsFour steps were required to obtain a translation consistent with the original version. Two hundred patients completed the questionnaire for validation. Internal consistency analysis found Cronbach's alphas > 0.7 for all scales (0.90 < α < 0.97). No floor or ceiling effect was found for all items (max = 85%). A ceiling effect was observed for all scales. Appearance and psychosocial impact scale items showed redundancy, with many inter-item correlations above 0.7. The CFA of the original structure displayed a reasonable fit, with RMSEA = 0.065, CFI = 0.974 and TLI = 0.972. Scales were positively correlated (0.45 <  ρ < 0.65; p < 0.001). Test-retest intra-class correlation coefficients ranged from 0.94 to 0.99 for all scales.

conclusionA French version of the SCAR-Q questionnaire is validated, ready for use.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsAnalysisCicatrixLanguagePatient reported outcome measuresSurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.