Observational studyInternal and emergency medicine2021
Association of physician experience with a higher prescription rate of anti-influenza agents in low-risk patients.
Observational study in Internal and emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- An observational study to identify causative factors for not using hydroxychloroquine in systemic lupus erythematosus.Scientific reports · 2024Observational
- Prescription of anti-influenza drugs in Japan, 2014-2020: A retrospective study using open data from the national claims database.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the influenza season, most patients suspected of having influenza undergo rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs) in Japan despite their low sensitivity. However, the physician's actual rationale for prescribing antivirals, besides the results of RIDTs, remains poorly understood. Our study sought to identify the role of clinical information and physicians' experience in the initiation of anti-influenza agents. We retrospectively reviewed 380 patients who underwent RIDTs at the emergency department of our hospital from September 2018 to May 2019. Data regarding sex, age, etc., which could affect the decision of prescribing antivirals, were extracted from medical records. We performed logistic regression analysis to analyze the concurrent effect of potentially relevant clinical factors, results of RIDTs, and the physician's status on antiviral prescription. Multivariable analysis revealed that a positive RIDT had the largest effect on antiviral prescription, followed by physician status, high regional influenza activity, and patients' presentation within 12 h of symptom onset. Patient's age, comorbidities, and presentation after 48 h of symptom onset were not associated with antiviral treatment. Physicians with more years of experience were significantly more likely to prescribe antivirals for patients with low risk of complications. Our findings revealed the physicians' rationale for initiating antiviral treatment and the discrepancy with guideline indications of antivirals, which is the patient's age and comorbidities. Physicians, especially those with more than 3 years of experience, frequently prescribed antivirals for patients with low risk of complications; thus, educational interventions against this population could be useful to improve this situation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.